Changeset 3fd0499 in sasmodels for sasmodels/models
- Timestamp:
- Apr 8, 2017 4:32:39 AM (8 years ago)
- Branches:
- master, core_shell_microgels, costrafo411, magnetic_model, ticket-1257-vesicle-product, ticket_1156, ticket_1265_superball, ticket_822_more_unit_tests
- Children:
- afd4692, 3a45c2c
- Parents:
- 16a8c63 (diff), b2921d0 (diff)
Note: this is a merge changeset, the changes displayed below correspond to the merge itself.
Use the (diff) links above to see all the changes relative to each parent. - Location:
- sasmodels/models
- Files:
-
- 6 added
- 5 deleted
- 25 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
sasmodels/models/cylinder.py
r15a90c1 r3fd0499 38 38 39 39 40 Numerical integration is simplified by a change of variable to $u = cos(\alpha)$ with 41 $sin(\alpha)=\sqrt{1-u^2}$. 40 Numerical integration is simplified by a change of variable to $u = cos(\alpha)$ with 41 $sin(\alpha)=\sqrt{1-u^2}$. 42 42 43 43 The output of the 1D scattering intensity function for randomly oriented … … 156 156 tests = [[{}, 0.2, 0.042761386790780453], 157 157 [{}, [0.2], [0.042761386790780453]], 158 # new coords 158 # new coords 159 159 [{'theta':80.1534480601659, 'phi':10.1510817110481}, (qx, qy), 0.03514647218513852], 160 160 [{'theta':80.1534480601659, 'phi':10.1510817110481}, [(qx, qy)], [0.03514647218513852]], -
sasmodels/models/parallelepiped.py
r1916c52 r3fd0499 24 24 The edge of the solid used to have to satisfy the condition that $A < B < C$. 25 25 After some improvements to the effective radius calculation, used with an S(Q), 26 it is beleived that this is no longer the case. 26 it is beleived that this is no longer the case. 27 27 28 28 The 1D scattering intensity $I(q)$ is calculated as: … … 189 189 mu = q*B 190 190 V: Volume of the rectangular parallelepiped 191 alpha: angle between the long axis of the 191 alpha: angle between the long axis of the 192 192 parallelepiped and the q-vector for 1D 193 193 """ … … 219 219 Return effective radius (ER) for P(q)*S(q) 220 220 """ 221 # now that axes can be in any size order, need to sort a,b,c where a~b and c is either much smaller 221 # now that axes can be in any size order, need to sort a,b,c where a~b and c is either much smaller 222 222 # or much larger 223 223 abc = np.vstack((length_a, length_b, length_c)) -
sasmodels/models/triaxial_ellipsoid.py
r16a8c63 r3fd0499 113 113 * **Author:** NIST IGOR/DANSE **Date:** pre 2010 114 114 * **Last Modified by:** Paul Kienzle (improved calculation) **Date:** April 4, 2017 115 * **Last Reviewed by:** Paul Kienzle & Richard Heenan **Date:** April 4, 2017115 * **Last Reviewed by:** Paul Kienzle & Richard Heenan **Date:** April 4, 2017 116 116 117 117 """ -
sasmodels/models/barbell.py
rfcb33e4 r0b56f38 87 87 * **Last Reviewed by:** Richard Heenan **Date:** January 4, 2017 88 88 """ 89 from numpy import inf 89 from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi 90 90 91 91 name = "barbell" … … 125 125 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=0, 126 126 ) 127 q = 0.1 128 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 129 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 130 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 131 tests = [[{}, 0.075, 25.5691260532], 132 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 3.04233067789], 133 ] 134 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/bcc_paracrystal.c
r4962519 r50beefe 90 90 double theta, double phi, double psi) 91 91 { 92 double q, cos_a1, cos_a2, cos_a3;93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_a3, cos_a2, cos_a1);92 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat; 93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 94 94 95 const double a1 = + cos_a3 - cos_a1 + cos_a2;96 const double a2 = + cos_a3 + cos_a1 - cos_a2;97 const double a3 = - cos_a3 + cos_a1 + cos_a2;95 const double a1 = +xhat - zhat + yhat; 96 const double a2 = +xhat + zhat - yhat; 97 const double a3 = -xhat + zhat + yhat; 98 98 99 99 const double qd = 0.5*q*dnn; -
sasmodels/models/bcc_paracrystal.py
r925ad6e re2d6e3b 99 99 """ 100 100 101 from numpy import inf 101 from numpy import inf, pi 102 102 103 103 name = "bcc_paracrystal" … … 141 141 psi_pd=15, psi_pd_n=0, 142 142 ) 143 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 144 # add 2d test later 145 q =4.*pi/220. 146 tests = [ 147 [{ }, 148 [0.001, q, 0.215268], [1.46601394721, 2.85851284174, 0.00866710287078]], 149 ] -
sasmodels/models/capped_cylinder.py
rfcb33e4 r0b56f38 91 91 92 92 """ 93 from numpy import inf 93 from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi 94 94 95 95 name = "capped_cylinder" … … 145 145 theta_pd=15, theta_pd_n=45, 146 146 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1) 147 q = 0.1 148 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 149 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 150 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 151 tests = [[{}, 0.075, 26.0698570695], 152 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 0.561811990502], 153 ] 154 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle.c
r592343f rb260926 30 30 31 31 static double 32 bicelle_kernel(double q q,32 bicelle_kernel(double q, 33 33 double rad, 34 34 double radthick, 35 35 double facthick, 36 double length,36 double halflength, 37 37 double rhoc, 38 38 double rhoh, … … 42 42 double cos_alpha) 43 43 { 44 double si1,si2,be1,be2;45 46 44 const double dr1 = rhoc-rhoh; 47 45 const double dr2 = rhor-rhosolv; 48 46 const double dr3 = rhoh-rhor; 49 const double vol1 = M_PI*rad*rad*(2.0*length); 50 const double vol2 = M_PI*(rad+radthick)*(rad+radthick)*2.0*(length+facthick); 51 const double vol3 = M_PI*rad*rad*2.0*(length+facthick); 52 double besarg1 = qq*rad*sin_alpha; 53 double besarg2 = qq*(rad+radthick)*sin_alpha; 54 double sinarg1 = qq*length*cos_alpha; 55 double sinarg2 = qq*(length+facthick)*cos_alpha; 47 const double vol1 = M_PI*square(rad)*2.0*(halflength); 48 const double vol2 = M_PI*square(rad+radthick)*2.0*(halflength+facthick); 49 const double vol3 = M_PI*square(rad)*2.0*(halflength+facthick); 56 50 57 be1 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg1);58 be2 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg2);59 si1 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg1);60 si2 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg2);51 const double be1 = sas_2J1x_x(q*(rad)*sin_alpha); 52 const double be2 = sas_2J1x_x(q*(rad+radthick)*sin_alpha); 53 const double si1 = sas_sinx_x(q*(halflength)*cos_alpha); 54 const double si2 = sas_sinx_x(q*(halflength+facthick)*cos_alpha); 61 55 62 56 const double t = vol1*dr1*si1*be1 + … … 64 58 vol3*dr3*si2*be1; 65 59 66 const double retval = t*t *sin_alpha;60 const double retval = t*t; 67 61 68 62 return retval; … … 71 65 72 66 static double 73 bicelle_integration(double q q,67 bicelle_integration(double q, 74 68 double rad, 75 69 double radthick, … … 83 77 // set up the integration end points 84 78 const double uplim = M_PI_4; 85 const double half height= 0.5*length;79 const double halflength = 0.5*length; 86 80 87 81 double summ = 0.0; … … 90 84 double sin_alpha, cos_alpha; // slots to hold sincos function output 91 85 SINCOS(alpha, sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 92 double yyy = Gauss76Wt[i] * bicelle_kernel(q q, rad, radthick, facthick,93 half height, rhoc, rhoh, rhor, rhosolv,86 double yyy = Gauss76Wt[i] * bicelle_kernel(q, rad, radthick, facthick, 87 halflength, rhoc, rhoh, rhor, rhosolv, 94 88 sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 95 summ += yyy ;89 summ += yyy*sin_alpha; 96 90 } 97 91 … … 119 113 double answer = bicelle_kernel(q, radius, thick_rim, thick_face, 120 114 0.5*length, core_sld, face_sld, rim_sld, 121 solvent_sld, sin_alpha, cos_alpha) / fabs(sin_alpha); 122 123 answer *= 1.0e-4; 124 125 return answer; 115 solvent_sld, sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 116 return 1.0e-4*answer; 126 117 } 127 118 -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle.py
r3b9a526 r0b56f38 88 88 """ 89 89 90 from numpy import inf, sin, cos 90 from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi 91 91 92 92 name = "core_shell_bicelle" … … 155 155 theta=90, 156 156 phi=0) 157 q = 0.1 158 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 159 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 160 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 161 tests = [[{}, 0.05, 7.4883545957], 162 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 2.81048892474 ], 163 ] 164 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner 157 165 158 #qx, qy = 0.4 * cos(pi/2.0), 0.5 * sin(0) -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle_elliptical.c
r592343f rf4f85b3 32 32 } 33 33 34 double 35 Iq(double qq, 36 double rad, 37 double x_core, 38 double radthick, 39 double facthick, 40 double length, 41 double rhoc, 42 double rhoh, 43 double rhor, 44 double rhosolv) 34 double Iq(double q, 35 double rad, 36 double x_core, 37 double radthick, 38 double facthick, 39 double length, 40 double rhoc, 41 double rhoh, 42 double rhor, 43 double rhosolv) 45 44 { 46 45 double si1,si2,be1,be2; … … 74 73 const double sin_alpha = sqrt(1.0 - cos_alpha*cos_alpha); 75 74 double inner_sum=0; 76 double sinarg1 = q q*halfheight*cos_alpha;77 double sinarg2 = q q*(halfheight+facthick)*cos_alpha;75 double sinarg1 = q*halfheight*cos_alpha; 76 double sinarg2 = q*(halfheight+facthick)*cos_alpha; 78 77 si1 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg1); 79 78 si2 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg2); … … 83 82 const double beta = ( Gauss76Z[j] +1.0)*M_PI_2; 84 83 const double rr = sqrt(rA - rB*cos(beta)); 85 double besarg1 = q q*rr*sin_alpha;86 double besarg2 = q q*(rr+radthick)*sin_alpha;84 double besarg1 = q*rr*sin_alpha; 85 double besarg2 = q*(rr+radthick)*sin_alpha; 87 86 be1 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg1); 88 87 be2 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg2); … … 114 113 { 115 114 // THIS NEEDS TESTING 116 double q q, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu;117 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q q, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu);115 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat; 116 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 118 117 const double dr1 = rhoc-rhoh; 119 118 const double dr2 = rhor-rhosolv; … … 125 124 const double vol3 = M_PI*rad*radius_major*2.0*(halfheight+facthick); 126 125 127 // Compute: r = sqrt((radius_major* cos_nu)^2 + (radius_minor*cos_mu)^2)126 // Compute: r = sqrt((radius_major*zhat)^2 + (radius_minor*yhat)^2) 128 127 // Given: radius_major = r_ratio * radius_minor 129 128 // ASSUME the sin_alpha is included in the separate integration over orientation of rod angle 130 const double r = rad*sqrt(square(x_core*cos_nu) + cos_mu*cos_mu); 131 const double be1 = sas_2J1x_x( qq*r ); 132 const double be2 = sas_2J1x_x( qq*(r + radthick ) ); 133 const double si1 = sas_sinx_x( qq*halfheight*cos_val ); 134 const double si2 = sas_sinx_x( qq*(halfheight + facthick)*cos_val ); 129 const double rad_minor = rad; 130 const double rad_major = rad*x_core; 131 const double r_hat = sqrt(square(rad_major*xhat) + square(rad_minor*yhat)); 132 const double rshell_hat = sqrt(square((rad_major+radthick)*xhat) 133 + square((rad_minor+radthick)*yhat)); 134 const double be1 = sas_2J1x_x( q*r_hat ); 135 const double be2 = sas_2J1x_x( q*rshell_hat ); 136 const double si1 = sas_sinx_x( q*halfheight*zhat ); 137 const double si2 = sas_sinx_x( q*(halfheight + facthick)*zhat ); 135 138 const double Aq = square( vol1*dr1*si1*be1 + vol2*dr2*si2*be2 + vol3*dr3*si2*be1); 136 139 //const double vol = form_volume(radius_minor, r_ratio, length); -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle_elliptical.py
r3b9a526 r16a8c63 80 80 81 81 82 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition. jpg82 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition.png 83 83 84 Definition of the angles for the oriented core_shell_bicelle_elliptical model.85 Note that *theta* and *phi* are currently defined differently to those for the core_shell_bicelle model. 84 Definition of the angles for the oriented core_shell_bicelle_elliptical particles. 85 86 86 87 87 … … 99 99 """ 100 100 101 from numpy import inf, sin, cos 101 from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi 102 102 103 103 name = "core_shell_bicelle_elliptical" … … 150 150 psi=0) 151 151 152 #qx, qy = 0.4 * cos(pi/2.0), 0.5 * sin(0) 152 q = 0.1 153 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, NOT READY YET pull #890 branch assume correct! 154 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 155 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 153 156 154 157 tests = [ … … 159 162 'sld_core':4.0, 'sld_face':7.0, 'sld_rim':1.0, 'sld_solvent':6.0, 'background':0.0}, 160 163 0.015, 286.540286], 161 ] 164 # [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 7.88866563001 ], 165 ] 166 167 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_cylinder.py
rfcb33e4 r0b56f38 73 73 """ 74 74 75 from numpy import pi, inf 75 from numpy import pi, inf, sin, cos 76 76 77 77 name = "core_shell_cylinder" … … 151 151 theta_pd=15, theta_pd_n=45, 152 152 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1) 153 153 q = 0.1 154 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 155 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 156 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 157 tests = [[{}, 0.075, 10.8552692237], 158 [{}, (qx, qy), 0.444618752741 ], 159 ] 160 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_parallelepiped.c
r1e7b0db0 r92dfe0c 134 134 double psi) 135 135 { 136 double q, cos_val_a, cos_val_b, cos_val_c;137 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_val_c, cos_val_b, cos_val_a);136 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat; 137 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 138 138 139 139 // cspkernel in csparallelepiped recoded here … … 160 160 double tc = length_a + 2.0*thick_rim_c; 161 161 //handle arg=0 separately, as sin(t)/t -> 1 as t->0 162 double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_a* cos_val_a);163 double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_b* cos_val_b);164 double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_c* cos_val_c);165 double siAt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*ta* cos_val_a);166 double siBt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tb* cos_val_b);167 double siCt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tc* cos_val_c);162 double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_a*xhat); 163 double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_b*yhat); 164 double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_c*zhat); 165 double siAt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*ta*xhat); 166 double siBt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tb*yhat); 167 double siCt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tc*zhat); 168 168 169 169 -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_parallelepiped.py
rcb0dc22 r1916c52 10 10 11 11 .. note:: 12 This model was originally ported from NIST IGOR macros. However, t is not13 yet fully understood by the SasView developers and is currently review.12 This model was originally ported from NIST IGOR macros. However, it is not 13 yet fully understood by the SasView developers and is currently under review. 14 14 15 15 The form factor is normalized by the particle volume $V$ such that … … 48 48 amplitudes of the core and shell, in the same manner as a core-shell model. 49 49 50 .. math:: 51 52 F_{a}(Q,\alpha,\beta)= 53 \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}Q(L_A+2t_A)\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}Q(L_A+2t_A)\sin\alpha\sin\beta} 54 - \frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}QL_A\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}QL_A\sin\alpha \sin\beta} \right] 55 \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}QL_B\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}QL_B\sin\alpha \sin\beta} \right] 56 \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}QL_C\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}QL_C\sin\alpha \sin\beta} \right] 50 57 51 58 .. note:: 52 59 60 Why does t_B not appear in the above equation? 53 61 For the calculation of the form factor to be valid, the sides of the solid 54 MUST be chosen such that** $A < B < C$.62 MUST (perhaps not any more?) be chosen such that** $A < B < C$. 55 63 If this inequality is not satisfied, the model will not report an error, 56 64 but the calculation will not be correct and thus the result wrong. 57 65 58 66 FITTING NOTES 59 If the scale is set equal to the particle volume fraction, |phi|, the returned67 If the scale is set equal to the particle volume fraction, $\phi$, the returned 60 68 value is the scattered intensity per unit volume, $I(q) = \phi P(q)$. 61 69 However, **no interparticle interference effects are included in this … … 73 81 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the core_shell_parallelepiped is calculated 74 82 based on the the averaged effective radius $(=\sqrt{(A+2t_A)(B+2t_B)/\pi})$ 75 and length $(C+2t_C)$ values, and used as the effective radius 76 for $S(Q)$ when $P(Q) * S(Q)$ is applied. 83 and length $(C+2t_C)$ values, after appropriately 84 sorting the three dimensions to give an oblate or prolate particle, to give an 85 effective radius, for $S(Q)$ when $P(Q) * S(Q)$ is applied. 77 86 78 87 To provide easy access to the orientation of the parallelepiped, we define the … … 83 92 *x*-axis of the detector. 84 93 85 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition. jpg94 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition.png 86 95 87 96 Definition of the angles for oriented core-shell parallelepipeds. 88 97 89 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection. jpg98 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection.png 90 99 91 100 Examples of the angles for oriented core-shell parallelepipeds against the … … 112 121 113 122 import numpy as np 114 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt 123 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt, cos, sin 115 124 116 125 name = "core_shell_parallelepiped" … … 186 195 psi_pd=10, psi_pd_n=1) 187 196 188 qx, qy = 0.2 * np.cos(2.5), 0.2 * np.sin(2.5) 197 # rkh 7/4/17 add random unit test for 2d, note make all params different, 2d values not tested against other codes or models 198 qx, qy = 0.2 * cos(pi/6.), 0.2 * sin(pi/6.) 189 199 tests = [[{}, 0.2, 0.533149288477], 190 200 [{}, [0.2], [0.533149288477]], 191 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi': 10.0}, (qx, qy), 0.032102135569],192 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi': 10.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.032102135569]],201 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi':20.0}, (qx, qy), 0.0853299803222], 202 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi':20.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.0853299803222]], 193 203 ] 194 204 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/ellipsoid.c
r130d4c7 r3b571ae 3 3 double Iqxy(double qx, double qy, double sld, double sld_solvent, 4 4 double radius_polar, double radius_equatorial, double theta, double phi); 5 6 static double7 _ellipsoid_kernel(double q, double radius_polar, double radius_equatorial, double cos_alpha)8 {9 double ratio = radius_polar/radius_equatorial;10 // Using ratio v = Rp/Re, we can expand the following to match the11 // form given in Guinier (1955)12 // r = Re * sqrt(1 + cos^2(T) (v^2 - 1))13 // = Re * sqrt( (1 - cos^2(T)) + v^2 cos^2(T) )14 // = Re * sqrt( sin^2(T) + v^2 cos^2(T) )15 // = sqrt( Re^2 sin^2(T) + Rp^2 cos^2(T) )16 //17 // Instead of using pythagoras we could pass in sin and cos; this may be18 // slightly better for 2D which has already computed it, but it introduces19 // an extra sqrt and square for 1-D not required by the current form, so20 // leave it as is.21 const double r = radius_equatorial22 * sqrt(1.0 + cos_alpha*cos_alpha*(ratio*ratio - 1.0));23 const double f = sas_3j1x_x(q*r);24 25 return f*f;26 }27 5 28 6 double form_volume(double radius_polar, double radius_equatorial) … … 37 15 double radius_equatorial) 38 16 { 17 // Using ratio v = Rp/Re, we can implement the form given in Guinier (1955) 18 // i(h) = int_0^pi/2 Phi^2(h a sqrt(cos^2 + v^2 sin^2) cos dT 19 // = int_0^pi/2 Phi^2(h a sqrt((1-sin^2) + v^2 sin^2) cos dT 20 // = int_0^pi/2 Phi^2(h a sqrt(1 + sin^2(v^2-1)) cos dT 21 // u-substitution of 22 // u = sin, du = cos dT 23 // i(h) = int_0^1 Phi^2(h a sqrt(1 + u^2(v^2-1)) du 24 const double v_square_minus_one = square(radius_polar/radius_equatorial) - 1.0; 25 39 26 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, 1] 27 // const double u = Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower)/2 + (upper+lower)/2; 40 28 const double zm = 0.5; 41 29 const double zb = 0.5; 42 30 double total = 0.0; 43 31 for (int i=0;i<76;i++) { 44 //const double cos_alpha = (Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower) + upper + lower)/2; 45 const double cos_alpha = Gauss76Z[i]*zm + zb; 46 total += Gauss76Wt[i] * _ellipsoid_kernel(q, radius_polar, radius_equatorial, cos_alpha); 32 const double u = Gauss76Z[i]*zm + zb; 33 const double r = radius_equatorial*sqrt(1.0 + u*u*v_square_minus_one); 34 const double f = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 35 total += Gauss76Wt[i] * f * f; 47 36 } 48 37 // translate dx in [-1,1] to dx in [lower,upper] … … 62 51 double q, sin_alpha, cos_alpha; 63 52 ORIENT_SYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, q, sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 64 const double form = _ellipsoid_kernel(q, radius_polar, radius_equatorial, cos_alpha); 53 const double r = sqrt(square(radius_equatorial*sin_alpha) 54 + square(radius_polar*cos_alpha)); 55 const double f = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 65 56 const double s = (sld - sld_solvent) * form_volume(radius_polar, radius_equatorial); 66 57 67 return 1.0e-4 * form * s * s;58 return 1.0e-4 * square(f * s); 68 59 } 69 60 -
sasmodels/models/ellipsoid.py
r925ad6e r0b56f38 18 18 .. math:: 19 19 20 F(q,\alpha) = \frac{3 \Delta \rho V (\sin[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)] 21 - \cos[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)])} 22 {[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)]^3} 20 F(q,\alpha) = \Delta \rho V \frac{3(\sin qr - qr \cos qr)}{(qr)^3} 23 21 24 and 22 for 25 23 26 24 .. math:: 27 25 28 r(R_p,R_e,\alpha) = \left[ R_e^2 \sin^2 \alpha 29 + R_p^2 \cos^2 \alpha \right]^{1/2} 26 r = \left[ R_e^2 \sin^2 \alpha + R_p^2 \cos^2 \alpha \right]^{1/2} 30 27 31 28 32 29 $\alpha$ is the angle between the axis of the ellipsoid and $\vec q$, 33 $V = (4/3)\pi R_pR_e^2$ is the volume of the ellipsoid , $R_p$ is the polar radius along the 34 rotational axis of the ellipsoid, $R_e$ is the equatorial radius perpendicular 35 to the rotational axis of the ellipsoid and $\Delta \rho$ (contrast) is the 36 scattering length density difference between the scatterer and the solvent. 30 $V = (4/3)\pi R_pR_e^2$ is the volume of the ellipsoid, $R_p$ is the polar 31 radius along the rotational axis of the ellipsoid, $R_e$ is the equatorial 32 radius perpendicular to the rotational axis of the ellipsoid and 33 $\Delta \rho$ (contrast) is the scattering length density difference between 34 the scatterer and the solvent. 37 35 38 For randomly oriented particles :36 For randomly oriented particles use the orientational average, 39 37 40 38 .. math:: 41 39 42 F^2(q)=\int_{0}^{\pi/2}{F^2(q,\alpha)\sin(\alpha)d\alpha}40 \langle F^2(q) \rangle = \int_{0}^{\pi/2}{F^2(q,\alpha)\sin(\alpha)\,d\alpha} 43 41 42 43 computed via substitution of $u=\sin(\alpha)$, $du=\cos(\alpha)\,d\alpha$ as 44 45 .. math:: 46 47 \langle F^2(q) \rangle = \int_0^1{F^2(q, u)\,du} 48 49 with 50 51 .. math:: 52 53 r = R_e \left[ 1 + u^2\left(R_p^2/R_e^2 - 1\right)\right]^{1/2} 44 54 45 55 To provide easy access to the orientation of the ellipsoid, we define … … 48 58 :ref:`cylinder orientation figure <cylinder-angle-definition>`. 49 59 For the ellipsoid, $\theta$ is the angle between the rotational axis 50 and the $z$ -axis. 60 and the $z$ -axis in the $xz$ plane followed by a rotation by $\phi$ 61 in the $xy$ plane. 51 62 52 63 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the solid ellipsoid is calculated based … … 90 101 than 500. 91 102 103 Model was also tested against the triaxial ellipsoid model with equal major 104 and minor equatorial radii. It is also consistent with the cyclinder model 105 with polar radius equal to length and equatorial radius equal to radius. 106 92 107 References 93 108 ---------- … … 96 111 *Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering*, 97 112 Plenum Press, New York, 1987. 113 114 Authorship and Verification 115 ---------------------------- 116 117 * **Author:** NIST IGOR/DANSE **Date:** pre 2010 118 * **Converted to sasmodels by:** Helen Park **Date:** July 9, 2014 119 * **Last Modified by:** Paul Kienzle **Date:** March 22, 2017 98 120 """ 99 121 100 from numpy import inf 122 from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi 101 123 102 124 name = "ellipsoid" … … 139 161 def ER(radius_polar, radius_equatorial): 140 162 import numpy as np 141 163 # see equation (26) in A.Isihara, J.Chem.Phys. 18(1950)1446-1449 142 164 ee = np.empty_like(radius_polar) 143 165 idx = radius_polar > radius_equatorial … … 168 190 theta_pd=15, theta_pd_n=45, 169 191 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1) 192 q = 0.1 193 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 194 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 195 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 196 tests = [[{}, 0.05, 54.8525847025], 197 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 1.74134670026 ], 198 ] 199 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/elliptical_cylinder.c
r592343f r61104c8 67 67 double theta, double phi, double psi) 68 68 { 69 double q, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu;70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu);69 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat; 70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 71 71 72 72 // Compute: r = sqrt((radius_major*cos_nu)^2 + (radius_minor*cos_mu)^2) 73 73 // Given: radius_major = r_ratio * radius_minor 74 const double r = radius_minor*sqrt(square(r_ratio* cos_nu) + cos_mu*cos_mu);74 const double r = radius_minor*sqrt(square(r_ratio*xhat) + square(yhat)); 75 75 const double be = sas_2J1x_x(q*r); 76 const double si = sas_sinx_x(q* 0.5*length*cos_val);76 const double si = sas_sinx_x(q*zhat*0.5*length); 77 77 const double Aq = be * si; 78 78 const double delrho = sld - solvent_sld; -
sasmodels/models/elliptical_cylinder.py
rfcb33e4 r16a8c63 64 64 oriented system. 65 65 66 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition. jpg66 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition.png 67 67 68 Definition of angles for 2D 68 Definition of angles for oriented elliptical cylinder, where axis_ratio >1, 69 and angle $\Psi$ is a rotation around the axis of the cylinder. 69 70 70 .. figure:: img/ cylinder_angle_projection.jpg71 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_projection.png 71 72 72 73 Examples of the angles for oriented elliptical cylinders against the 73 detector plane .74 detector plane, with $\Psi$ = 0. 74 75 75 76 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the cylinder is calculated based on the … … 108 109 """ 109 110 110 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt 111 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt, sin, cos 111 112 112 113 name = "elliptical_cylinder" … … 149 150 + (length + radius) * (length + pi * radius)) 150 151 return 0.5 * (ddd) ** (1. / 3.) 152 q = 0.1 153 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, NOT READY YET pull #890 branch assume correct! 154 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 155 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 151 156 152 157 tests = [ … … 158 163 'sld_solvent':1.0, 'background':0.0}, 159 164 0.001, 675.504402], 165 # [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 7.88866563001 ], 160 166 ] -
sasmodels/models/fcc_paracrystal.c
r4962519 r50beefe 90 90 double theta, double phi, double psi) 91 91 { 92 double q, cos_a1, cos_a2, cos_a3;93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_a3, cos_a2, cos_a1);92 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat; 93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 94 94 95 const double a1 = cos_a2 + cos_a3;96 const double a2 = cos_a3 + cos_a1;97 const double a3 = cos_a2 + cos_a1;95 const double a1 = yhat + xhat; 96 const double a2 = xhat + zhat; 97 const double a3 = yhat + zhat; 98 98 const double qd = 0.5*q*dnn; 99 99 const double arg = 0.5*square(qd*d_factor)*(a1*a1 + a2*a2 + a3*a3); -
sasmodels/models/fcc_paracrystal.py
r925ad6e re2d6e3b 90 90 """ 91 91 92 from numpy import inf 92 from numpy import inf, pi 93 93 94 94 name = "fcc_paracrystal" … … 128 128 psi_pd=15, psi_pd_n=0, 129 129 ) 130 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 131 # add 2d test later 132 q =4.*pi/220. 133 tests = [ 134 [{ }, 135 [0.001, q, 0.215268], [0.275164706668, 5.7776842567, 0.00958167119232]], 136 ] -
sasmodels/models/hollow_cylinder.py
raea2e2a r0b56f38 60 60 """ 61 61 62 from numpy import pi, inf 62 from numpy import pi, inf, sin, cos 63 63 64 64 name = "hollow_cylinder" … … 129 129 theta_pd=10, theta_pd_n=5, 130 130 ) 131 131 q = 0.1 132 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, assume correct! 133 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 134 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 132 135 # Parameters for unit tests 133 136 tests = [ 134 137 [{}, 0.00005, 1764.926], 135 138 [{}, 'VR', 1.8], 136 [{}, 0.001, 1756.76] 137 ] 139 [{}, 0.001, 1756.76], 140 [{}, (qx, qy), 2.36885476192 ], 141 ] 142 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/parallelepiped.c
r1e7b0db0 rd605080 67 67 double psi) 68 68 { 69 double q, cos_val_a, cos_val_b, cos_val_c;70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_val_c, cos_val_b, cos_val_a);69 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat; 70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 71 71 72 const double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5* q*length_a*cos_val_a);73 const double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5* q*length_b*cos_val_b);74 const double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5* q*length_c*cos_val_c);72 const double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5*length_a*q*xhat); 73 const double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5*length_b*q*yhat); 74 const double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5*length_c*q*zhat); 75 75 const double V = form_volume(length_a, length_b, length_c); 76 76 const double drho = (sld - solvent_sld); -
sasmodels/models/sc_paracrystal.c
r4962519 r50beefe 111 111 double psi) 112 112 { 113 double q, cos_a1, cos_a2, cos_a3;114 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_a3, cos_a2, cos_a1);113 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat; 114 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 115 115 116 116 const double qd = q*dnn; … … 118 118 const double tanh_qd = tanh(arg); 119 119 const double cosh_qd = cosh(arg); 120 const double Zq = tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd* cos_a1)/cosh_qd)121 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd* cos_a2)/cosh_qd)122 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd* cos_a3)/cosh_qd);120 const double Zq = tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd*zhat)/cosh_qd) 121 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd*yhat)/cosh_qd) 122 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd*xhat)/cosh_qd); 123 123 124 124 const double Fq = sphere_form(q, radius, sphere_sld, solvent_sld)*Zq; -
sasmodels/models/stacked_disks.py
rc3ccaec r0b56f38 103 103 """ 104 104 105 from numpy import inf 105 from numpy import inf, sin, cos, pi 106 106 107 107 name = "stacked_disks" … … 152 152 # After redefinition of spherical coordinates - 153 153 # tests had in old coords theta=0, phi=0; new coords theta=90, phi=0 154 # but should not matter here as so far all the tests are 1D not 2D 154 q = 0.1 155 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, assume correct! 156 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 157 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 155 158 tests = [ 156 159 # Accuracy tests based on content in test/utest_extra_models.py. … … 186 189 [{'thick_core': 10.0, 187 190 'thick_layer': 15.0, 191 'radius': 100.0, 192 'n_stacking': 5, 193 'sigma_d': 0.0, 194 'sld_core': 4.0, 195 'sld_layer': -0.4, 196 'solvent_sd': 5.0, 197 'theta': 90.0, 198 'phi': 20.0, 199 'scale': 0.01, 200 'background': 0.001}, 201 (qx, qy), 0.0491167089952 ], 202 [{'thick_core': 10.0, 203 'thick_layer': 15.0, 188 204 'radius': 3000.0, 189 205 'n_stacking': 5, … … 228 244 'background': 0.001, 229 245 }, ([0.4, 0.5]), [0.00105074, 0.00121761]], 246 [{'thick_core': 10.0, 247 'thick_layer': 15.0, 248 'radius': 3000.0, 249 'n_stacking': 1.0, 250 'sigma_d': 0.0, 251 'sld_core': 4.0, 252 'sld_layer': -0.4, 253 'solvent_sd': 5.0, 254 'theta': 90.0, 255 'phi': 20.0, 256 'scale': 0.01, 257 'background': 0.001, 258 }, (qx, qy), 0.0341738733124 ], 230 259 231 260 [{'thick_core': 10.0, -
sasmodels/models/triaxial_ellipsoid.c
r925ad6e r68dd6a9 20 20 double radius_polar) 21 21 { 22 double sn, cn; 23 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, 1] 24 const double zm = 0.5; 25 const double zb = 0.5; 22 const double pa = square(radius_equat_minor/radius_equat_major) - 1.0; 23 const double pc = square(radius_polar/radius_equat_major) - 1.0; 24 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, pi/2] 25 const double zm = M_PI_4; 26 const double zb = M_PI_4; 26 27 double outer = 0.0; 27 28 for (int i=0;i<76;i++) { 28 //const double cos_alpha = (Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower) + upper + lower)/2; 29 const double x = 0.5*(Gauss76Z[i] + 1.0); 30 SINCOS(M_PI_2*x, sn, cn); 31 const double acosx2 = radius_equat_minor*radius_equat_minor*cn*cn; 32 const double bsinx2 = radius_equat_major*radius_equat_major*sn*sn; 33 const double c2 = radius_polar*radius_polar; 29 //const double u = Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower)/2 + (upper + lower)/2; 30 const double phi = Gauss76Z[i]*zm + zb; 31 const double pa_sinsq_phi = pa*square(sin(phi)); 34 32 35 33 double inner = 0.0; 34 const double um = 0.5; 35 const double ub = 0.5; 36 36 for (int j=0;j<76;j++) { 37 const double ysq = square(Gauss76Z[j]*zm + zb); 38 const double t = q*sqrt(acosx2 + bsinx2*(1.0-ysq) + c2*ysq); 39 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x(t); 40 inner += Gauss76Wt[j] * fq * fq ; 37 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, 1] 38 const double usq = square(Gauss76Z[j]*um + ub); 39 const double r = radius_equat_major*sqrt(pa_sinsq_phi*(1.0-usq) + 1.0 + pc*usq); 40 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 41 inner += Gauss76Wt[j] * fq * fq; 41 42 } 42 outer += Gauss76Wt[i] * 0.5 * inner;43 outer += Gauss76Wt[i] * inner; // correcting for dx later 43 44 } 44 // translate dx in [-1,1] to dx in [lower,upper]45 const double fqsq = outer *zm;45 // translate integration ranges from [-1,1] to [lower,upper] and normalize by 4 pi 46 const double fqsq = outer/4.0; // = outer*um*zm*8.0/(4.0*M_PI); 46 47 const double s = (sld - sld_solvent) * form_volume(radius_equat_minor, radius_equat_major, radius_polar); 47 48 return 1.0e-4 * s * s * fqsq; … … 58 59 double psi) 59 60 { 60 double q, calpha, cmu, cnu;61 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, calpha, cmu, cnu);61 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat; 62 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat); 62 63 63 const double t = q*sqrt(radius_equat_minor*radius_equat_minor*cnu*cnu64 + radius_equat_major*radius_equat_major*cmu*cmu65 + radius_polar*radius_polar*calpha*calpha);66 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x( t);64 const double r = sqrt(square(radius_equat_minor*xhat) 65 + square(radius_equat_major*yhat) 66 + square(radius_polar*zhat)); 67 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 67 68 const double s = (sld - sld_solvent) * form_volume(radius_equat_minor, radius_equat_major, radius_polar); 68 69
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.