Changes in / [3fd0499:b2921d0] in sasmodels
- Files:
-
- 5 added
- 7 deleted
- 28 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
explore/angular_pd.py
r8267e0b r12eb36b 47 47 48 48 def draw_mesh_new(ax, theta, dtheta, phi, dphi, flow, radius=10., dist='gauss'): 49 theta_center = radians( 90-theta)49 theta_center = radians(theta) 50 50 phi_center = radians(phi) 51 51 flow_center = radians(flow) … … 137 137 radius=11., dist=dist) 138 138 if not axis.startswith('d'): 139 ax.view_init(elev= 90-theta if use_new elsetheta, azim=phi)139 ax.view_init(elev=theta, azim=phi) 140 140 plt.gcf().canvas.draw() 141 141 -
sasmodels/compare.py
r650c6d2 r650c6d2 84 84 -edit starts the parameter explorer 85 85 -default/-demo* use demo vs default parameters 86 -h elp/-html shows the model docs instead of running the model86 -html shows the model docs instead of running the model 87 87 -title="note" adds note to the plot title, after the model name 88 88 -data="path" uses q, dq from the data file … … 836 836 'linear', 'log', 'q4', 837 837 'hist', 'nohist', 838 'edit', 'html', 'help',838 'edit', 'html', 839 839 'demo', 'default', 840 840 ]) … … 1005 1005 elif arg == '-default': opts['use_demo'] = False 1006 1006 elif arg == '-html': opts['html'] = True 1007 elif arg == '-help': opts['html'] = True1008 1007 # pylint: enable=bad-whitespace 1009 1008 -
sasmodels/kernel_header.c
rb00a646 r1e7b0db0 148 148 inline double sas_sinx_x(double x) { return x==0 ? 1.0 : sin(x)/x; } 149 149 150 // To rotate from the canonical position to theta, phi, psi, first rotate by151 // psi about the major axis, oriented along z, which is a rotation in the152 // detector plane xy. Next rotate by theta about the y axis, aligning the major153 // axis in the xz plane. Finally, rotate by phi in the detector plane xy.154 // To compute the scattering, undo these rotations in reverse order:155 // rotate in xy by -phi, rotate in xz by -theta, rotate in xy by -psi156 // The returned q is the length of the q vector and (xhat, yhat, zhat) is a unit157 // vector in the q direction.158 // To change between counterclockwise and clockwise rotation, change the159 // sign of phi and psi.160 161 150 #if 1 162 151 //think cos(theta) should be sin(theta) in new coords, RKH 11Jan2017 … … 177 166 #endif 178 167 179 #if 1180 #define ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat) do { \181 q = sqrt(qx*qx + qy*qy); \182 const double qxhat = qx/q; \183 const double qyhat = qy/q; \184 double sin_theta, cos_theta; \185 double sin_phi, cos_phi; \186 double sin_psi, cos_psi; \187 SINCOS(theta*M_PI_180, sin_theta, cos_theta); \188 SINCOS(phi*M_PI_180, sin_phi, cos_phi); \189 SINCOS(psi*M_PI_180, sin_psi, cos_psi); \190 xhat = qxhat*(-sin_phi*sin_psi + cos_theta*cos_phi*cos_psi) \191 + qyhat*( cos_phi*sin_psi + cos_theta*sin_phi*cos_psi); \192 yhat = qxhat*(-sin_phi*cos_psi - cos_theta*cos_phi*sin_psi) \193 + qyhat*( cos_phi*cos_psi - cos_theta*sin_phi*sin_psi); \194 zhat = qxhat*(-sin_theta*cos_phi) \195 + qyhat*(-sin_theta*sin_phi); \196 } while (0)197 #else198 // SasView 3.x definition of orientation199 168 #define ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_alpha, cos_mu, cos_nu) do { \ 200 169 q = sqrt(qx*qx + qy*qy); \ … … 211 180 cos_nu = (-cos_phi*sin_psi*sin_theta + sin_phi*cos_psi)*qxhat + sin_psi*cos_theta*qyhat; \ 212 181 } while (0) 213 #endif -
sasmodels/models/barbell.py
r0b56f38 rfcb33e4 87 87 * **Last Reviewed by:** Richard Heenan **Date:** January 4, 2017 88 88 """ 89 from numpy import inf , sin, cos, pi89 from numpy import inf 90 90 91 91 name = "barbell" … … 125 125 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=0, 126 126 ) 127 q = 0.1128 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!129 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)130 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)131 tests = [[{}, 0.075, 25.5691260532],132 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 3.04233067789],133 ]134 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/bcc_paracrystal.c
r50beefe r4962519 90 90 double theta, double phi, double psi) 91 91 { 92 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat;93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);92 double q, cos_a1, cos_a2, cos_a3; 93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_a3, cos_a2, cos_a1); 94 94 95 const double a1 = + xhat - zhat + yhat;96 const double a2 = + xhat + zhat - yhat;97 const double a3 = - xhat + zhat + yhat;95 const double a1 = +cos_a3 - cos_a1 + cos_a2; 96 const double a2 = +cos_a3 + cos_a1 - cos_a2; 97 const double a3 = -cos_a3 + cos_a1 + cos_a2; 98 98 99 99 const double qd = 0.5*q*dnn; -
sasmodels/models/bcc_paracrystal.py
re2d6e3b r925ad6e 99 99 """ 100 100 101 from numpy import inf , pi101 from numpy import inf 102 102 103 103 name = "bcc_paracrystal" … … 141 141 psi_pd=15, psi_pd_n=0, 142 142 ) 143 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!144 # add 2d test later145 q =4.*pi/220.146 tests = [147 [{ },148 [0.001, q, 0.215268], [1.46601394721, 2.85851284174, 0.00866710287078]],149 ] -
sasmodels/models/capped_cylinder.py
r0b56f38 rfcb33e4 91 91 92 92 """ 93 from numpy import inf , sin, cos, pi93 from numpy import inf 94 94 95 95 name = "capped_cylinder" … … 145 145 theta_pd=15, theta_pd_n=45, 146 146 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1) 147 q = 0.1148 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!149 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)150 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)151 tests = [[{}, 0.075, 26.0698570695],152 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 0.561811990502],153 ]154 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle.c
rb260926 r592343f 30 30 31 31 static double 32 bicelle_kernel(double q ,32 bicelle_kernel(double qq, 33 33 double rad, 34 34 double radthick, 35 35 double facthick, 36 double halflength,36 double length, 37 37 double rhoc, 38 38 double rhoh, … … 42 42 double cos_alpha) 43 43 { 44 double si1,si2,be1,be2; 45 44 46 const double dr1 = rhoc-rhoh; 45 47 const double dr2 = rhor-rhosolv; 46 48 const double dr3 = rhoh-rhor; 47 const double vol1 = M_PI*square(rad)*2.0*(halflength); 48 const double vol2 = M_PI*square(rad+radthick)*2.0*(halflength+facthick); 49 const double vol3 = M_PI*square(rad)*2.0*(halflength+facthick); 49 const double vol1 = M_PI*rad*rad*(2.0*length); 50 const double vol2 = M_PI*(rad+radthick)*(rad+radthick)*2.0*(length+facthick); 51 const double vol3 = M_PI*rad*rad*2.0*(length+facthick); 52 double besarg1 = qq*rad*sin_alpha; 53 double besarg2 = qq*(rad+radthick)*sin_alpha; 54 double sinarg1 = qq*length*cos_alpha; 55 double sinarg2 = qq*(length+facthick)*cos_alpha; 50 56 51 const double be1 = sas_2J1x_x(q*(rad)*sin_alpha);52 const double be2 = sas_2J1x_x(q*(rad+radthick)*sin_alpha);53 const double si1 = sas_sinx_x(q*(halflength)*cos_alpha);54 const double si2 = sas_sinx_x(q*(halflength+facthick)*cos_alpha);57 be1 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg1); 58 be2 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg2); 59 si1 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg1); 60 si2 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg2); 55 61 56 62 const double t = vol1*dr1*si1*be1 + … … 58 64 vol3*dr3*si2*be1; 59 65 60 const double retval = t*t ;66 const double retval = t*t*sin_alpha; 61 67 62 68 return retval; … … 65 71 66 72 static double 67 bicelle_integration(double q ,73 bicelle_integration(double qq, 68 74 double rad, 69 75 double radthick, … … 77 83 // set up the integration end points 78 84 const double uplim = M_PI_4; 79 const double half length= 0.5*length;85 const double halfheight = 0.5*length; 80 86 81 87 double summ = 0.0; … … 84 90 double sin_alpha, cos_alpha; // slots to hold sincos function output 85 91 SINCOS(alpha, sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 86 double yyy = Gauss76Wt[i] * bicelle_kernel(q , rad, radthick, facthick,87 half length, rhoc, rhoh, rhor, rhosolv,92 double yyy = Gauss76Wt[i] * bicelle_kernel(qq, rad, radthick, facthick, 93 halfheight, rhoc, rhoh, rhor, rhosolv, 88 94 sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 89 summ += yyy *sin_alpha;95 summ += yyy; 90 96 } 91 97 … … 113 119 double answer = bicelle_kernel(q, radius, thick_rim, thick_face, 114 120 0.5*length, core_sld, face_sld, rim_sld, 115 solvent_sld, sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 116 return 1.0e-4*answer; 121 solvent_sld, sin_alpha, cos_alpha) / fabs(sin_alpha); 122 123 answer *= 1.0e-4; 124 125 return answer; 117 126 } 118 127 -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle.py
r0b56f38 r8afefae 88 88 """ 89 89 90 from numpy import inf, sin, cos , pi90 from numpy import inf, sin, cos 91 91 92 92 name = "core_shell_bicelle" … … 155 155 theta=90, 156 156 phi=0) 157 q = 0.1158 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!159 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)160 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)161 tests = [[{}, 0.05, 7.4883545957],162 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 2.81048892474 ],163 ]164 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner165 157 158 #qx, qy = 0.4 * cos(pi/2.0), 0.5 * sin(0) -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle_elliptical.c
rf4f85b3 r592343f 32 32 } 33 33 34 double Iq(double q, 35 double rad, 36 double x_core, 37 double radthick, 38 double facthick, 39 double length, 40 double rhoc, 41 double rhoh, 42 double rhor, 43 double rhosolv) 34 double 35 Iq(double qq, 36 double rad, 37 double x_core, 38 double radthick, 39 double facthick, 40 double length, 41 double rhoc, 42 double rhoh, 43 double rhor, 44 double rhosolv) 44 45 { 45 46 double si1,si2,be1,be2; … … 73 74 const double sin_alpha = sqrt(1.0 - cos_alpha*cos_alpha); 74 75 double inner_sum=0; 75 double sinarg1 = q *halfheight*cos_alpha;76 double sinarg2 = q *(halfheight+facthick)*cos_alpha;76 double sinarg1 = qq*halfheight*cos_alpha; 77 double sinarg2 = qq*(halfheight+facthick)*cos_alpha; 77 78 si1 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg1); 78 79 si2 = sas_sinx_x(sinarg2); … … 82 83 const double beta = ( Gauss76Z[j] +1.0)*M_PI_2; 83 84 const double rr = sqrt(rA - rB*cos(beta)); 84 double besarg1 = q *rr*sin_alpha;85 double besarg2 = q *(rr+radthick)*sin_alpha;85 double besarg1 = qq*rr*sin_alpha; 86 double besarg2 = qq*(rr+radthick)*sin_alpha; 86 87 be1 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg1); 87 88 be2 = sas_2J1x_x(besarg2); … … 113 114 { 114 115 // THIS NEEDS TESTING 115 double q , xhat, yhat, zhat;116 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q , xhat, yhat, zhat);116 double qq, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu; 117 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, qq, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu); 117 118 const double dr1 = rhoc-rhoh; 118 119 const double dr2 = rhor-rhosolv; … … 124 125 const double vol3 = M_PI*rad*radius_major*2.0*(halfheight+facthick); 125 126 126 // Compute: r = sqrt((radius_major* zhat)^2 + (radius_minor*yhat)^2)127 // Compute: r = sqrt((radius_major*cos_nu)^2 + (radius_minor*cos_mu)^2) 127 128 // Given: radius_major = r_ratio * radius_minor 128 129 // ASSUME the sin_alpha is included in the separate integration over orientation of rod angle 129 const double rad_minor = rad; 130 const double rad_major = rad*x_core; 131 const double r_hat = sqrt(square(rad_major*xhat) + square(rad_minor*yhat)); 132 const double rshell_hat = sqrt(square((rad_major+radthick)*xhat) 133 + square((rad_minor+radthick)*yhat)); 134 const double be1 = sas_2J1x_x( q*r_hat ); 135 const double be2 = sas_2J1x_x( q*rshell_hat ); 136 const double si1 = sas_sinx_x( q*halfheight*zhat ); 137 const double si2 = sas_sinx_x( q*(halfheight + facthick)*zhat ); 130 const double r = rad*sqrt(square(x_core*cos_nu) + cos_mu*cos_mu); 131 const double be1 = sas_2J1x_x( qq*r ); 132 const double be2 = sas_2J1x_x( qq*(r + radthick ) ); 133 const double si1 = sas_sinx_x( qq*halfheight*cos_val ); 134 const double si2 = sas_sinx_x( qq*(halfheight + facthick)*cos_val ); 138 135 const double Aq = square( vol1*dr1*si1*be1 + vol2*dr2*si2*be2 + vol3*dr3*si2*be1); 139 136 //const double vol = form_volume(radius_minor, r_ratio, length); -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_bicelle_elliptical.py
r15a90c1 r8afefae 80 80 81 81 82 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition. png82 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition.jpg 83 83 84 Definition of the angles for the oriented core_shell_bicelle_elliptical particles.85 84 Definition of the angles for the oriented core_shell_bicelle_elliptical model. 85 Note that *theta* and *phi* are currently defined differently to those for the core_shell_bicelle model. 86 86 87 87 … … 99 99 """ 100 100 101 from numpy import inf, sin, cos , pi101 from numpy import inf, sin, cos 102 102 103 103 name = "core_shell_bicelle_elliptical" … … 150 150 psi=0) 151 151 152 q = 0.1 153 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, NOT READY YET pull #890 branch assume correct! 154 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 155 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 152 #qx, qy = 0.4 * cos(pi/2.0), 0.5 * sin(0) 156 153 157 154 tests = [ … … 162 159 'sld_core':4.0, 'sld_face':7.0, 'sld_rim':1.0, 'sld_solvent':6.0, 'background':0.0}, 163 160 0.015, 286.540286], 164 # [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 7.88866563001 ], 165 ] 166 167 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner 161 ] -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_cylinder.py
r0b56f38 r8e68ea0 73 73 """ 74 74 75 from numpy import pi, inf , sin, cos75 from numpy import pi, inf 76 76 77 77 name = "core_shell_cylinder" … … 151 151 theta_pd=15, theta_pd_n=45, 152 152 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1) 153 q = 0.1 154 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct! 155 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 156 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 157 tests = [[{}, 0.075, 10.8552692237], 158 [{}, (qx, qy), 0.444618752741 ], 159 ] 160 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner 153 -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_parallelepiped.c
r92dfe0c r1e7b0db0 134 134 double psi) 135 135 { 136 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat;137 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);136 double q, cos_val_a, cos_val_b, cos_val_c; 137 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_val_c, cos_val_b, cos_val_a); 138 138 139 139 // cspkernel in csparallelepiped recoded here … … 160 160 double tc = length_a + 2.0*thick_rim_c; 161 161 //handle arg=0 separately, as sin(t)/t -> 1 as t->0 162 double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_a* xhat);163 double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_b* yhat);164 double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_c* zhat);165 double siAt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*ta* xhat);166 double siBt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tb* yhat);167 double siCt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tc* zhat);162 double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_a*cos_val_a); 163 double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_b*cos_val_b); 164 double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_c*cos_val_c); 165 double siAt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*ta*cos_val_a); 166 double siBt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tb*cos_val_b); 167 double siCt = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*tc*cos_val_c); 168 168 169 169 -
sasmodels/models/core_shell_parallelepiped.py
r1916c52 rcb0dc22 10 10 11 11 .. note:: 12 This model was originally ported from NIST IGOR macros. However, it is not13 yet fully understood by the SasView developers and is currently underreview.12 This model was originally ported from NIST IGOR macros. However,t is not 13 yet fully understood by the SasView developers and is currently review. 14 14 15 15 The form factor is normalized by the particle volume $V$ such that … … 48 48 amplitudes of the core and shell, in the same manner as a core-shell model. 49 49 50 .. math::51 52 F_{a}(Q,\alpha,\beta)=53 \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}Q(L_A+2t_A)\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}Q(L_A+2t_A)\sin\alpha\sin\beta}54 - \frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}QL_A\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}QL_A\sin\alpha \sin\beta} \right]55 \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}QL_B\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}QL_B\sin\alpha \sin\beta} \right]56 \left[\frac{\sin(\tfrac{1}{2}QL_C\sin\alpha \sin\beta)}{\tfrac{1}{2}QL_C\sin\alpha \sin\beta} \right]57 50 58 51 .. note:: 59 52 60 Why does t_B not appear in the above equation?61 53 For the calculation of the form factor to be valid, the sides of the solid 62 MUST (perhaps not any more?)be chosen such that** $A < B < C$.54 MUST be chosen such that** $A < B < C$. 63 55 If this inequality is not satisfied, the model will not report an error, 64 56 but the calculation will not be correct and thus the result wrong. 65 57 66 58 FITTING NOTES 67 If the scale is set equal to the particle volume fraction, $\phi$, the returned59 If the scale is set equal to the particle volume fraction, |phi|, the returned 68 60 value is the scattered intensity per unit volume, $I(q) = \phi P(q)$. 69 61 However, **no interparticle interference effects are included in this … … 81 73 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the core_shell_parallelepiped is calculated 82 74 based on the the averaged effective radius $(=\sqrt{(A+2t_A)(B+2t_B)/\pi})$ 83 and length $(C+2t_C)$ values, after appropriately 84 sorting the three dimensions to give an oblate or prolate particle, to give an 85 effective radius, for $S(Q)$ when $P(Q) * S(Q)$ is applied. 75 and length $(C+2t_C)$ values, and used as the effective radius 76 for $S(Q)$ when $P(Q) * S(Q)$ is applied. 86 77 87 78 To provide easy access to the orientation of the parallelepiped, we define the … … 92 83 *x*-axis of the detector. 93 84 94 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition. png85 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition.jpg 95 86 96 87 Definition of the angles for oriented core-shell parallelepipeds. 97 88 98 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection. png89 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection.jpg 99 90 100 91 Examples of the angles for oriented core-shell parallelepipeds against the … … 121 112 122 113 import numpy as np 123 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt , cos, sin114 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt 124 115 125 116 name = "core_shell_parallelepiped" … … 195 186 psi_pd=10, psi_pd_n=1) 196 187 197 # rkh 7/4/17 add random unit test for 2d, note make all params different, 2d values not tested against other codes or models 198 qx, qy = 0.2 * cos(pi/6.), 0.2 * sin(pi/6.) 188 qx, qy = 0.2 * np.cos(2.5), 0.2 * np.sin(2.5) 199 189 tests = [[{}, 0.2, 0.533149288477], 200 190 [{}, [0.2], [0.533149288477]], 201 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi': 20.0}, (qx, qy), 0.0853299803222],202 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi': 20.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.0853299803222]],191 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi':10.0}, (qx, qy), 0.032102135569], 192 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi':10.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.032102135569]], 203 193 ] 204 194 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/cylinder.py
r3330bb4 r3330bb4 38 38 39 39 40 Numerical integration is simplified by a change of variable to $u = cos(\alpha)$ with 41 $sin(\alpha)=\sqrt{1-u^2}$. 40 Numerical integration is simplified by a change of variable to $u = cos(\alpha)$ with 41 $sin(\alpha)=\sqrt{1-u^2}$. 42 42 43 43 The output of the 1D scattering intensity function for randomly oriented … … 64 64 65 65 Definition of the angles for oriented cylinders. 66 67 .. figure:: img/cylinder_angle_projection.png68 69 Examples for oriented cylinders.70 66 71 67 The $\theta$ and $\phi$ parameters only appear in the model when fitting 2d data. … … 156 152 tests = [[{}, 0.2, 0.042761386790780453], 157 153 [{}, [0.2], [0.042761386790780453]], 158 # new coords 154 # new coords 159 155 [{'theta':80.1534480601659, 'phi':10.1510817110481}, (qx, qy), 0.03514647218513852], 160 156 [{'theta':80.1534480601659, 'phi':10.1510817110481}, [(qx, qy)], [0.03514647218513852]], -
sasmodels/models/ellipsoid.c
r3b571ae r130d4c7 3 3 double Iqxy(double qx, double qy, double sld, double sld_solvent, 4 4 double radius_polar, double radius_equatorial, double theta, double phi); 5 6 static double 7 _ellipsoid_kernel(double q, double radius_polar, double radius_equatorial, double cos_alpha) 8 { 9 double ratio = radius_polar/radius_equatorial; 10 // Using ratio v = Rp/Re, we can expand the following to match the 11 // form given in Guinier (1955) 12 // r = Re * sqrt(1 + cos^2(T) (v^2 - 1)) 13 // = Re * sqrt( (1 - cos^2(T)) + v^2 cos^2(T) ) 14 // = Re * sqrt( sin^2(T) + v^2 cos^2(T) ) 15 // = sqrt( Re^2 sin^2(T) + Rp^2 cos^2(T) ) 16 // 17 // Instead of using pythagoras we could pass in sin and cos; this may be 18 // slightly better for 2D which has already computed it, but it introduces 19 // an extra sqrt and square for 1-D not required by the current form, so 20 // leave it as is. 21 const double r = radius_equatorial 22 * sqrt(1.0 + cos_alpha*cos_alpha*(ratio*ratio - 1.0)); 23 const double f = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 24 25 return f*f; 26 } 5 27 6 28 double form_volume(double radius_polar, double radius_equatorial) … … 15 37 double radius_equatorial) 16 38 { 17 // Using ratio v = Rp/Re, we can implement the form given in Guinier (1955)18 // i(h) = int_0^pi/2 Phi^2(h a sqrt(cos^2 + v^2 sin^2) cos dT19 // = int_0^pi/2 Phi^2(h a sqrt((1-sin^2) + v^2 sin^2) cos dT20 // = int_0^pi/2 Phi^2(h a sqrt(1 + sin^2(v^2-1)) cos dT21 // u-substitution of22 // u = sin, du = cos dT23 // i(h) = int_0^1 Phi^2(h a sqrt(1 + u^2(v^2-1)) du24 const double v_square_minus_one = square(radius_polar/radius_equatorial) - 1.0;25 26 39 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, 1] 27 // const double u = Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower)/2 + (upper+lower)/2;28 40 const double zm = 0.5; 29 41 const double zb = 0.5; 30 42 double total = 0.0; 31 43 for (int i=0;i<76;i++) { 32 const double u = Gauss76Z[i]*zm + zb; 33 const double r = radius_equatorial*sqrt(1.0 + u*u*v_square_minus_one); 34 const double f = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 35 total += Gauss76Wt[i] * f * f; 44 //const double cos_alpha = (Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower) + upper + lower)/2; 45 const double cos_alpha = Gauss76Z[i]*zm + zb; 46 total += Gauss76Wt[i] * _ellipsoid_kernel(q, radius_polar, radius_equatorial, cos_alpha); 36 47 } 37 48 // translate dx in [-1,1] to dx in [lower,upper] … … 51 62 double q, sin_alpha, cos_alpha; 52 63 ORIENT_SYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, q, sin_alpha, cos_alpha); 53 const double r = sqrt(square(radius_equatorial*sin_alpha) 54 + square(radius_polar*cos_alpha)); 55 const double f = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 64 const double form = _ellipsoid_kernel(q, radius_polar, radius_equatorial, cos_alpha); 56 65 const double s = (sld - sld_solvent) * form_volume(radius_polar, radius_equatorial); 57 66 58 return 1.0e-4 * square(f * s);67 return 1.0e-4 * form * s * s; 59 68 } 60 69 -
sasmodels/models/ellipsoid.py
r0b56f38 r925ad6e 18 18 .. math:: 19 19 20 F(q,\alpha) = \Delta \rho V \frac{3(\sin qr - qr \cos qr)}{(qr)^3} 20 F(q,\alpha) = \frac{3 \Delta \rho V (\sin[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)] 21 - \cos[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)])} 22 {[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)]^3} 21 23 22 for 24 and 23 25 24 26 .. math:: 25 27 26 r = \left[ R_e^2 \sin^2 \alpha + R_p^2 \cos^2 \alpha \right]^{1/2} 28 r(R_p,R_e,\alpha) = \left[ R_e^2 \sin^2 \alpha 29 + R_p^2 \cos^2 \alpha \right]^{1/2} 27 30 28 31 29 32 $\alpha$ is the angle between the axis of the ellipsoid and $\vec q$, 30 $V = (4/3)\pi R_pR_e^2$ is the volume of the ellipsoid, $R_p$ is the polar 31 radius along the rotational axis of the ellipsoid, $R_e$ is the equatorial 32 radius perpendicular to the rotational axis of the ellipsoid and 33 $\Delta \rho$ (contrast) is the scattering length density difference between 34 the scatterer and the solvent. 33 $V = (4/3)\pi R_pR_e^2$ is the volume of the ellipsoid , $R_p$ is the polar radius along the 34 rotational axis of the ellipsoid, $R_e$ is the equatorial radius perpendicular 35 to the rotational axis of the ellipsoid and $\Delta \rho$ (contrast) is the 36 scattering length density difference between the scatterer and the solvent. 35 37 36 For randomly oriented particles use the orientational average,38 For randomly oriented particles: 37 39 38 40 .. math:: 39 41 40 \langle F^2(q) \rangle = \int_{0}^{\pi/2}{F^2(q,\alpha)\sin(\alpha)\,d\alpha}42 F^2(q)=\int_{0}^{\pi/2}{F^2(q,\alpha)\sin(\alpha)d\alpha} 41 43 42 43 computed via substitution of $u=\sin(\alpha)$, $du=\cos(\alpha)\,d\alpha$ as44 45 .. math::46 47 \langle F^2(q) \rangle = \int_0^1{F^2(q, u)\,du}48 49 with50 51 .. math::52 53 r = R_e \left[ 1 + u^2\left(R_p^2/R_e^2 - 1\right)\right]^{1/2}54 44 55 45 To provide easy access to the orientation of the ellipsoid, we define … … 58 48 :ref:`cylinder orientation figure <cylinder-angle-definition>`. 59 49 For the ellipsoid, $\theta$ is the angle between the rotational axis 60 and the $z$ -axis in the $xz$ plane followed by a rotation by $\phi$ 61 in the $xy$ plane. 50 and the $z$ -axis. 62 51 63 52 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the solid ellipsoid is calculated based … … 101 90 than 500. 102 91 103 Model was also tested against the triaxial ellipsoid model with equal major104 and minor equatorial radii. It is also consistent with the cyclinder model105 with polar radius equal to length and equatorial radius equal to radius.106 107 92 References 108 93 ---------- … … 111 96 *Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering*, 112 97 Plenum Press, New York, 1987. 113 114 Authorship and Verification115 ----------------------------116 117 * **Author:** NIST IGOR/DANSE **Date:** pre 2010118 * **Converted to sasmodels by:** Helen Park **Date:** July 9, 2014119 * **Last Modified by:** Paul Kienzle **Date:** March 22, 2017120 98 """ 121 99 122 from numpy import inf , sin, cos, pi100 from numpy import inf 123 101 124 102 name = "ellipsoid" … … 161 139 def ER(radius_polar, radius_equatorial): 162 140 import numpy as np 163 # see equation (26) in A.Isihara, J.Chem.Phys. 18(1950)1446-1449 141 164 142 ee = np.empty_like(radius_polar) 165 143 idx = radius_polar > radius_equatorial … … 190 168 theta_pd=15, theta_pd_n=45, 191 169 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1) 192 q = 0.1193 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!194 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)195 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)196 tests = [[{}, 0.05, 54.8525847025],197 [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 1.74134670026 ],198 ]199 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/elliptical_cylinder.c
r61104c8 r592343f 67 67 double theta, double phi, double psi) 68 68 { 69 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat;70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);69 double q, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu; 70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_val, cos_mu, cos_nu); 71 71 72 72 // Compute: r = sqrt((radius_major*cos_nu)^2 + (radius_minor*cos_mu)^2) 73 73 // Given: radius_major = r_ratio * radius_minor 74 const double r = radius_minor*sqrt(square(r_ratio* xhat) + square(yhat));74 const double r = radius_minor*sqrt(square(r_ratio*cos_nu) + cos_mu*cos_mu); 75 75 const double be = sas_2J1x_x(q*r); 76 const double si = sas_sinx_x(q* zhat*0.5*length);76 const double si = sas_sinx_x(q*0.5*length*cos_val); 77 77 const double Aq = be * si; 78 78 const double delrho = sld - solvent_sld; -
sasmodels/models/elliptical_cylinder.py
r15a90c1 rfcb33e4 64 64 oriented system. 65 65 66 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition. png66 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition.jpg 67 67 68 Definition of angles for oriented elliptical cylinder, where axis_ratio >1, 69 and angle $\Psi$ is a rotation around the axis of the cylinder. 68 Definition of angles for 2D 70 69 71 .. figure:: img/ elliptical_cylinder_angle_projection.png70 .. figure:: img/cylinder_angle_projection.jpg 72 71 73 72 Examples of the angles for oriented elliptical cylinders against the 74 detector plane , with $\Psi$ = 0.73 detector plane. 75 74 76 75 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the cylinder is calculated based on the … … 109 108 """ 110 109 111 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt , sin, cos110 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt 112 111 113 112 name = "elliptical_cylinder" … … 150 149 + (length + radius) * (length + pi * radius)) 151 150 return 0.5 * (ddd) ** (1. / 3.) 152 q = 0.1153 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, NOT READY YET pull #890 branch assume correct!154 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)155 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)156 151 157 152 tests = [ … … 163 158 'sld_solvent':1.0, 'background':0.0}, 164 159 0.001, 675.504402], 165 # [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 7.88866563001 ],166 160 ] -
sasmodels/models/fcc_paracrystal.c
r50beefe r4962519 90 90 double theta, double phi, double psi) 91 91 { 92 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat;93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);92 double q, cos_a1, cos_a2, cos_a3; 93 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_a3, cos_a2, cos_a1); 94 94 95 const double a1 = yhat + xhat;96 const double a2 = xhat + zhat;97 const double a3 = yhat + zhat;95 const double a1 = cos_a2 + cos_a3; 96 const double a2 = cos_a3 + cos_a1; 97 const double a3 = cos_a2 + cos_a1; 98 98 const double qd = 0.5*q*dnn; 99 99 const double arg = 0.5*square(qd*d_factor)*(a1*a1 + a2*a2 + a3*a3); -
sasmodels/models/fcc_paracrystal.py
re2d6e3b r925ad6e 90 90 """ 91 91 92 from numpy import inf , pi92 from numpy import inf 93 93 94 94 name = "fcc_paracrystal" … … 128 128 psi_pd=15, psi_pd_n=0, 129 129 ) 130 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!131 # add 2d test later132 q =4.*pi/220.133 tests = [134 [{ },135 [0.001, q, 0.215268], [0.275164706668, 5.7776842567, 0.00958167119232]],136 ] -
sasmodels/models/hollow_cylinder.py
r0b56f38 raea2e2a 60 60 """ 61 61 62 from numpy import pi, inf , sin, cos62 from numpy import pi, inf 63 63 64 64 name = "hollow_cylinder" … … 129 129 theta_pd=10, theta_pd_n=5, 130 130 ) 131 q = 0.1 132 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, assume correct! 133 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 134 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 131 135 132 # Parameters for unit tests 136 133 tests = [ 137 134 [{}, 0.00005, 1764.926], 138 135 [{}, 'VR', 1.8], 139 [{}, 0.001, 1756.76], 140 [{}, (qx, qy), 2.36885476192 ], 141 ] 142 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner 136 [{}, 0.001, 1756.76] 137 ] -
sasmodels/models/parallelepiped.c
rd605080 r1e7b0db0 67 67 double psi) 68 68 { 69 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat;70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);69 double q, cos_val_a, cos_val_b, cos_val_c; 70 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_val_c, cos_val_b, cos_val_a); 71 71 72 const double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5* length_a*q*xhat);73 const double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5* length_b*q*yhat);74 const double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5* length_c*q*zhat);72 const double siA = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_a*cos_val_a); 73 const double siB = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_b*cos_val_b); 74 const double siC = sas_sinx_x(0.5*q*length_c*cos_val_c); 75 75 const double V = form_volume(length_a, length_b, length_c); 76 76 const double drho = (sld - solvent_sld); -
sasmodels/models/parallelepiped.py
r3330bb4 r3330bb4 15 15 .. _parallelepiped-image: 16 16 17 18 17 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_geometry.jpg 19 18 … … 22 21 .. note:: 23 22 24 The edge of the solid used to have tosatisfy the condition that $A < B < C$.25 After some improvements to the effective radius calculation, used with an S(Q),26 it is beleived that this is no longer the case.23 The edge of the solid must satisfy the condition that $A < B < C$. 24 This requirement is not enforced in the model, so it is up to the 25 user to check this during the analysis. 27 26 28 27 The 1D scattering intensity $I(q)$ is calculated as: … … 72 71 73 72 NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the parallelepiped is calculated based on 74 the averaged effective radius, after appropriately 75 sorting the three dimensions, to give an oblate or prolate particle, $(=\sqrt{A B / \pi})$ and 73 the averaged effective radius $(=\sqrt{A B / \pi})$ and 76 74 length $(= C)$ values, and used as the effective radius for 77 75 $S(q)$ when $P(q) \cdot S(q)$ is applied. … … 104 102 .. _parallelepiped-orientation: 105 103 106 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition. png107 108 Definition of the angles for oriented parallelepiped , shown with $A < B < C$.109 110 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection. png111 112 Examples of the angles for an oriented parallelepipedagainst the104 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_definition.jpg 105 106 Definition of the angles for oriented parallelepipeds. 107 108 .. figure:: img/parallelepiped_angle_projection.jpg 109 110 Examples of the angles for oriented parallelepipeds against the 113 111 detector plane. 114 112 … … 118 116 .. math:: 119 117 120 P(q_x, q_y) = \left[\frac{\sin( \tfrac{1}{2}qA\cos\alpha)}{(\tfrac{1}{2}qA\cos\alpha)}\right]^2121 \left[\frac{\sin( \tfrac{1}{2}qB\cos\beta)}{(\tfrac{1}{2}qB\cos\beta)}\right]^2122 \left[\frac{\sin( \tfrac{1}{2}qC\cos\gamma)}{(\tfrac{1}{2}qC\cos\gamma)}\right]^2118 P(q_x, q_y) = \left[\frac{\sin(qA\cos\alpha/2)}{(qA\cos\alpha/2)}\right]^2 119 \left[\frac{\sin(qB\cos\beta/2)}{(qB\cos\beta/2)}\right]^2 120 \left[\frac{\sin(qC\cos\gamma/2)}{(qC\cos\gamma/2)}\right]^2 123 121 124 122 with … … 156 154 angles. 157 155 156 This model is based on form factor calculations implemented in a c-library 157 provided by the NIST Center for Neutron Research (Kline, 2006). 158 158 159 159 References … … 163 163 164 164 R Nayuk and K Huber, *Z. Phys. Chem.*, 226 (2012) 837-854 165 166 Authorship and Verification167 ----------------------------168 169 * **Author:** This model is based on form factor calculations implemented in a c-library170 provided by the NIST Center for Neutron Research (Kline, 2006).171 * **Last Modified by:** Paul Kienzle **Date:** April 05, 2017172 * **Last Reviewed by:** Richard Heenan **Date:** April 06, 2017173 174 165 """ 175 166 176 167 import numpy as np 177 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt , sin, cos168 from numpy import pi, inf, sqrt 178 169 179 170 name = "parallelepiped" … … 189 180 mu = q*B 190 181 V: Volume of the rectangular parallelepiped 191 alpha: angle between the long axis of the 182 alpha: angle between the long axis of the 192 183 parallelepiped and the q-vector for 1D 193 184 """ … … 217 208 def ER(length_a, length_b, length_c): 218 209 """ 219 Return effective radius (ER) for P(q)*S(q)210 Return effective radius (ER) for P(q)*S(q) 220 211 """ 221 # now that axes can be in any size order, need to sort a,b,c where a~b and c is either much smaller 222 # or much larger 223 abc = np.vstack((length_a, length_b, length_c)) 224 abc = np.sort(abc, axis=0) 225 selector = (abc[1] - abc[0]) > (abc[2] - abc[1]) 226 length = np.where(selector, abc[0], abc[2]) 212 227 213 # surface average radius (rough approximation) 228 radius = np.sqrt(np.where(~selector, abc[0]*abc[1], abc[1]*abc[2])/ pi)229 230 ddd = 0.75 * radius * (2*radius*length + (length + radius)*(length + pi*radius))214 surf_rad = sqrt(length_a * length_b / pi) 215 216 ddd = 0.75 * surf_rad * (2 * surf_rad * length_c + (length_c + surf_rad) * (length_c + pi * surf_rad)) 231 217 return 0.5 * (ddd) ** (1. / 3.) 232 218 … … 244 230 phi_pd=10, phi_pd_n=1, 245 231 psi_pd=10, psi_pd_n=10) 246 # rkh 7/4/17 add random unit test for 2d, note make all params different, 2d values not tested against other codes or models 247 qx, qy = 0.2 * cos(pi/6.), 0.2 * sin(pi/6.)232 233 qx, qy = 0.2 * np.cos(2.5), 0.2 * np.sin(2.5) 248 234 tests = [[{}, 0.2, 0.17758004974], 249 235 [{}, [0.2], [0.17758004974]], 250 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi': 20.0}, (qx, qy), 0.0089517140475],251 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi': 20.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.0089517140475]],236 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi':10.0}, (qx, qy), 0.00560296014], 237 [{'theta':10.0, 'phi':10.0}, [(qx, qy)], [0.00560296014]], 252 238 ] 253 239 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner -
sasmodels/models/sc_paracrystal.c
r50beefe r4962519 111 111 double psi) 112 112 { 113 double q, zhat, yhat, xhat;114 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);113 double q, cos_a1, cos_a2, cos_a3; 114 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, cos_a3, cos_a2, cos_a1); 115 115 116 116 const double qd = q*dnn; … … 118 118 const double tanh_qd = tanh(arg); 119 119 const double cosh_qd = cosh(arg); 120 const double Zq = tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd* zhat)/cosh_qd)121 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd* yhat)/cosh_qd)122 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd* xhat)/cosh_qd);120 const double Zq = tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd*cos_a1)/cosh_qd) 121 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd*cos_a2)/cosh_qd) 122 * tanh_qd/(1. - cos(qd*cos_a3)/cosh_qd); 123 123 124 124 const double Fq = sphere_form(q, radius, sphere_sld, solvent_sld)*Zq; -
sasmodels/models/stacked_disks.py
r0b56f38 rb7e8b94 103 103 """ 104 104 105 from numpy import inf , sin, cos, pi105 from numpy import inf 106 106 107 107 name = "stacked_disks" … … 152 152 # After redefinition of spherical coordinates - 153 153 # tests had in old coords theta=0, phi=0; new coords theta=90, phi=0 154 q = 0.1 155 # april 6 2017, rkh added a 2d unit test, assume correct! 156 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0) 157 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0) 154 # but should not matter here as so far all the tests are 1D not 2D 158 155 tests = [ 159 156 # Accuracy tests based on content in test/utest_extra_models.py. … … 189 186 [{'thick_core': 10.0, 190 187 'thick_layer': 15.0, 191 'radius': 100.0,192 'n_stacking': 5,193 'sigma_d': 0.0,194 'sld_core': 4.0,195 'sld_layer': -0.4,196 'solvent_sd': 5.0,197 'theta': 90.0,198 'phi': 20.0,199 'scale': 0.01,200 'background': 0.001},201 (qx, qy), 0.0491167089952 ],202 [{'thick_core': 10.0,203 'thick_layer': 15.0,204 188 'radius': 3000.0, 205 189 'n_stacking': 5, … … 244 228 'background': 0.001, 245 229 }, ([0.4, 0.5]), [0.00105074, 0.00121761]], 246 [{'thick_core': 10.0,247 'thick_layer': 15.0,248 'radius': 3000.0,249 'n_stacking': 1.0,250 'sigma_d': 0.0,251 'sld_core': 4.0,252 'sld_layer': -0.4,253 'solvent_sd': 5.0,254 'theta': 90.0,255 'phi': 20.0,256 'scale': 0.01,257 'background': 0.001,258 }, (qx, qy), 0.0341738733124 ],259 230 260 231 [{'thick_core': 10.0, -
sasmodels/models/triaxial_ellipsoid.c
r68dd6a9 r925ad6e 20 20 double radius_polar) 21 21 { 22 const double pa = square(radius_equat_minor/radius_equat_major) - 1.0; 23 const double pc = square(radius_polar/radius_equat_major) - 1.0; 24 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, pi/2] 25 const double zm = M_PI_4; 26 const double zb = M_PI_4; 22 double sn, cn; 23 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, 1] 24 const double zm = 0.5; 25 const double zb = 0.5; 27 26 double outer = 0.0; 28 27 for (int i=0;i<76;i++) { 29 //const double u = Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower)/2 + (upper + lower)/2; 30 const double phi = Gauss76Z[i]*zm + zb; 31 const double pa_sinsq_phi = pa*square(sin(phi)); 28 //const double cos_alpha = (Gauss76Z[i]*(upper-lower) + upper + lower)/2; 29 const double x = 0.5*(Gauss76Z[i] + 1.0); 30 SINCOS(M_PI_2*x, sn, cn); 31 const double acosx2 = radius_equat_minor*radius_equat_minor*cn*cn; 32 const double bsinx2 = radius_equat_major*radius_equat_major*sn*sn; 33 const double c2 = radius_polar*radius_polar; 32 34 33 35 double inner = 0.0; 34 const double um = 0.5;35 const double ub = 0.5;36 36 for (int j=0;j<76;j++) { 37 // translate a point in [-1,1] to a point in [0, 1] 38 const double usq = square(Gauss76Z[j]*um + ub); 39 const double r = radius_equat_major*sqrt(pa_sinsq_phi*(1.0-usq) + 1.0 + pc*usq); 40 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x(q*r); 41 inner += Gauss76Wt[j] * fq * fq; 37 const double ysq = square(Gauss76Z[j]*zm + zb); 38 const double t = q*sqrt(acosx2 + bsinx2*(1.0-ysq) + c2*ysq); 39 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x(t); 40 inner += Gauss76Wt[j] * fq * fq ; 42 41 } 43 outer += Gauss76Wt[i] * inner; // correcting for dx later42 outer += Gauss76Wt[i] * 0.5 * inner; 44 43 } 45 // translate integration ranges from [-1,1] to [lower,upper] and normalize by 4 pi46 const double fqsq = outer /4.0; // = outer*um*zm*8.0/(4.0*M_PI);44 // translate dx in [-1,1] to dx in [lower,upper] 45 const double fqsq = outer*zm; 47 46 const double s = (sld - sld_solvent) * form_volume(radius_equat_minor, radius_equat_major, radius_polar); 48 47 return 1.0e-4 * s * s * fqsq; … … 59 58 double psi) 60 59 { 61 double q, xhat, yhat, zhat;62 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, xhat, yhat, zhat);60 double q, calpha, cmu, cnu; 61 ORIENT_ASYMMETRIC(qx, qy, theta, phi, psi, q, calpha, cmu, cnu); 63 62 64 const double r = sqrt(square(radius_equat_minor*xhat)65 + square(radius_equat_major*yhat)66 + square(radius_polar*zhat));67 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x( q*r);63 const double t = q*sqrt(radius_equat_minor*radius_equat_minor*cnu*cnu 64 + radius_equat_major*radius_equat_major*cmu*cmu 65 + radius_polar*radius_polar*calpha*calpha); 66 const double fq = sas_3j1x_x(t); 68 67 const double s = (sld - sld_solvent) * form_volume(radius_equat_minor, radius_equat_major, radius_polar); 69 68 -
sasmodels/models/triaxial_ellipsoid.py
r3330bb4 r3330bb4 2 2 # Note: model title and parameter table are inserted automatically 3 3 r""" 4 All three axes are of different lengths with $R_a \leq R_b \leq R_c$ 5 **Users should maintain this inequality for all calculations**. 6 7 .. math:: 8 9 P(q) = \text{scale} V \left< F^2(q) \right> + \text{background} 10 11 where the volume $V = 4/3 \pi R_a R_b R_c$, and the averaging 12 $\left<\ldots\right>$ is applied over all orientations for 1D. 13 14 .. figure:: img/triaxial_ellipsoid_geometry.jpg 15 16 Ellipsoid schematic. 17 4 18 Definition 5 19 ---------- 6 20 7 .. figure:: img/triaxial_ellipsoid_geometry.jpg 8 9 Ellipsoid with $R_a$ as *radius_equat_minor*, $R_b$ as *radius_equat_major* 10 and $R_c$ as *radius_polar*. 11 12 Given an ellipsoid 21 The form factor calculated is 13 22 14 23 .. math:: 15 24 16 \frac{X^2}{R_a^2} + \frac{Y^2}{R_b^2} + \frac{Z^2}{R_c^2} = 1 17 18 the scattering for randomly oriented particles is defined by the average over all orientations $\Omega$ of: 19 20 .. math:: 21 22 P(q) = \text{scale}(\Delta\rho)^2\frac{V}{4 \pi}\int_\Omega \Phi^2(qr) d\Omega + \text{background} 25 P(q) = \frac{\text{scale}}{V}\int_0^1\int_0^1 26 \Phi^2(qR_a^2\cos^2( \pi x/2) + qR_b^2\sin^2(\pi y/2)(1-y^2) + R_c^2y^2) 27 dx dy 23 28 24 29 where … … 26 31 .. math:: 27 32 28 \Phi(qr) &= 3 j_1(qr)/qr = 3 (\sin qr - qr \cos qr)/(qr)^3 \\ 29 r^2 &= R_a^2e^2 + R_b^2f^2 + R_c^2g^2 \\ 30 V &= \tfrac{4}{3} \pi R_a R_b R_c 31 32 The $e$, $f$ and $g$ terms are the projections of the orientation vector on $X$, 33 $Y$ and $Z$ respectively. Keeping the orientation fixed at the canonical 34 axes, we can integrate over the incident direction using polar angle 35 $-\pi/2 \le \gamma \le \pi/2$ and equatorial angle $0 \le \phi \le 2\pi$ 36 (as defined in ref [1]), 37 38 .. math:: 39 40 \langle\Phi^2\rangle = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \Phi^2(qr) \cos \gamma\,d\gamma d\phi 41 42 with $e = \cos\gamma \sin\phi$, $f = \cos\gamma \cos\phi$ and $g = \sin\gamma$. 43 A little algebra yields 44 45 .. math:: 46 47 r^2 = b^2(p_a \sin^2 \phi \cos^2 \gamma + 1 + p_c \sin^2 \gamma) 48 49 for 50 51 .. math:: 52 53 p_a = \frac{a^2}{b^2} - 1 \text{ and } p_c = \frac{c^2}{b^2} - 1 54 55 Due to symmetry, the ranges can be restricted to a single quadrant 56 $0 \le \gamma \le \pi/2$ and $0 \le \phi \le \pi/2$, scaling the resulting 57 integral by 8. The computation is done using the substitution $u = \sin\gamma$, 58 $du = \cos\gamma\,d\gamma$, giving 59 60 .. math:: 61 62 \langle\Phi^2\rangle &= 8 \int_0^{\pi/2} \int_0^1 \Phi^2(qr) du d\phi \\ 63 r^2 &= b^2(p_a \sin^2(\phi)(1 - u^2) + 1 + p_c u^2) 33 \Phi(u) = 3 u^{-3} (\sin u - u \cos u) 64 34 65 35 To provide easy access to the orientation of the triaxial ellipsoid, 66 36 we define the axis of the cylinder using the angles $\theta$, $\phi$ 67 and $\psi$. These angles are defined analogously to the elliptical_cylinder below 68 69 .. figure:: img/elliptical_cylinder_angle_definition.png 70 71 Definition of angles for oriented triaxial ellipsoid, where radii shown here are $a < b << c$ 72 and angle $\Psi$ is a rotation around the axis of the particle. 73 37 and $\psi$. These angles are defined on 38 :numref:`triaxial-ellipsoid-angles` . 74 39 The angle $\psi$ is the rotational angle around its own $c$ axis 75 40 against the $q$ plane. For example, $\psi = 0$ when the … … 78 43 .. _triaxial-ellipsoid-angles: 79 44 80 .. figure:: img/triaxial_ellipsoid_angle_projection. png45 .. figure:: img/triaxial_ellipsoid_angle_projection.jpg 81 46 82 Some example angles for oriented ellipsoid.47 The angles for oriented ellipsoid. 83 48 84 49 The radius-of-gyration for this system is $R_g^2 = (R_a R_b R_c)^2/5$. 85 50 86 The contrast $\Delta\rho$is defined as SLD(ellipsoid) - SLD(solvent). In the51 The contrast is defined as SLD(ellipsoid) - SLD(solvent). In the 87 52 parameters, $R_a$ is the minor equatorial radius, $R_b$ is the major 88 53 equatorial radius, and $R_c$ is the polar radius of the ellipsoid. … … 104 69 ---------- 105 70 106 [1] Finnigan, J.A., Jacobs, D.J., 1971. 107 *Light scattering by ellipsoidal particles in solution*, 108 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 4, 72-77. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/4/1/310 109 110 Authorship and Verification 111 ---------------------------- 112 113 * **Author:** NIST IGOR/DANSE **Date:** pre 2010 114 * **Last Modified by:** Paul Kienzle (improved calculation) **Date:** April 4, 2017 115 * **Last Reviewed by:** Paul Kienzle & Richard Heenan **Date:** April 4, 2017 116 71 L A Feigin and D I Svergun, *Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray 72 and Neutron Scattering*, Plenum, New York, 1987. 117 73 """ 118 74 119 from numpy import inf , sin, cos, pi75 from numpy import inf 120 76 121 77 name = "triaxial_ellipsoid" … … 135 91 "Solvent scattering length density"], 136 92 ["radius_equat_minor", "Ang", 20, [0, inf], "volume", 137 "Minor equatorial radius , Ra"],93 "Minor equatorial radius"], 138 94 ["radius_equat_major", "Ang", 400, [0, inf], "volume", 139 "Major equatorial radius , Rb"],95 "Major equatorial radius"], 140 96 ["radius_polar", "Ang", 10, [0, inf], "volume", 141 "Polar radius , Rc"],97 "Polar radius"], 142 98 ["theta", "degrees", 60, [-inf, inf], "orientation", 143 99 "In plane angle"], … … 152 108 def ER(radius_equat_minor, radius_equat_major, radius_polar): 153 109 """ 154 Returns the effective radius used in the S*P calculation110 Returns the effective radius used in the S*P calculation 155 111 """ 156 112 import numpy as np 157 113 from .ellipsoid import ER as ellipsoid_ER 158 159 # now that radii can be in any size order, radii need sorting a,b,c where a~b and c is either much smaller 160 # or much larger 161 radii = np.vstack((radius_equat_major, radius_equat_minor, radius_polar)) 162 radii = np.sort(radii, axis=0) 163 selector = (radii[1] - radii[0]) > (radii[2] - radii[1]) 164 polar = np.where(selector, radii[0], radii[2]) 165 equatorial = np.sqrt(np.where(~selector, radii[0]*radii[1], radii[1]*radii[2])) 166 return ellipsoid_ER(polar, equatorial) 114 return ellipsoid_ER(radius_polar, np.sqrt(radius_equat_minor * radius_equat_major)) 167 115 168 116 demo = dict(scale=1, background=0, … … 176 124 phi_pd=15, phi_pd_n=1, 177 125 psi_pd=15, psi_pd_n=1) 178 179 q = 0.1180 # april 6 2017, rkh add unit tests, NOT compared with any other calc method, assume correct!181 # add 2d test after pull #890182 qx = q*cos(pi/6.0)183 qy = q*sin(pi/6.0)184 tests = [[{}, 0.05, 24.8839548033],185 # [{'theta':80., 'phi':10.}, (qx, qy), 9999. ],186 ]187 del qx, qy # not necessary to delete, but cleaner
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.