Changes between Initial Version and Version 2 of Ticket #962


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 29, 2017 9:35:42 PM (7 years ago)
Author:
butler
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #962 – Description

    initial v2  
    66Dear Ziang, 
    77I am not sure if anyone has replied to you previously, if not then apologies we usually respond very quickly. 
    8 Thank you for pointing out the typo in the star polymer model documentation. It seems that I was the last person to check this model, so the team can blame me for not noticing. The correction to this will take some while to filter down into a release version of sasview. Personally I would also like to change the fitting parameter in the model from (Rg)^2 to just Rg (see #552 ) which would be more logical, but there is some history here. 
     8Thank you for pointing out the typo in the star polymer model documentation. It seems that I was the last person to check this model, so the team can blame me for not noticing. The correction to this will take some while to filter down into a release version of sasview. Personally I would also like to change the fitting parameter in the model from (Rg)^2^ to just Rg (see #552 ) which would be more logical, but there is some history here. 
    99Thank you again, 
    1010Richard Heenan 
    … …  
    1515Subject: [Sasview-help] SASView starpolymer model fit typo 
    1616 
    17 Dear Sir/Madam: 
     17Dear !Sir/Madam: 
    1818 
    1919I'm a graduate student from the university of Minnesota and have been using the SASView software for my SAXS data fitting.  
    2020 
    21 I found a typo in the "help" section of the star polymer model (shape-independent), I think v should equal to u*f/(3f-2) instead of u^2*f/(3f-2) since u is already defined as u=q^2*Rg^2 in the line below. I think it's just a typo in the "help" but it might be worth checking if the code is built according to correct form factor. Thank you! 
     21I found a typo in the "help" section of the star polymer model (shape-independent), I think v should equal to u*f/(3f-2) instead of u^2^*f/(3f-2) since u is already defined as u=q^2^*Rg^2^ in the line below. I think it's just a typo in the "help" but it might be worth checking if the code is built according to correct form factor. Thank you! 
    2222 
    2323Best,