Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 9 months ago

#542 new enhancement

capped_cylinder & barbell docs and/or computations could be improved

Reported by: richardh Owned by: pkienzle
Priority: minor Milestone: SasView 4.3.0
Component: sasmodels Keywords:
Cc: Work Package: SasView QA and testing


capped_cylinder computations could be improved - see notes included in the .py file, current model requires user to keep cap radius > cylinder radius

ticket submitted by Richard, but assigned to PAK, who may know what to do.

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by ajj

  • Component changed from SansView to SasView

comment:2 Changed 10 months ago by richardh

  • Component changed from SasView to sasmodels
  • Milestone changed from SasView Next Release +1 to sasmodels WishList
  • Summary changed from capped_cylinder computations could be improved to capped_cylinder & barbell docs and/or computations could be improved

Whilst looking at ER calcs for barbell and capped_cylinder I note that there seems to be inconsistencies between the docs and the calculations. I suspect the calculation is OK but the docs need improvement?

e.g. concerning the sign of distance h, where for both models the docs say h is negative, but a note in capped_cylinder.c says it is positive.

e.g docs for both say "The scale factor is equivalent to the volume fraction of cylinders, each of volume, V" which is a little odd?

Suspect the orignal goal of this ticket to improve capped_cylinder calculations may have been done ? (need to look at github …)

comment:3 Changed 9 months ago by butler

  • Milestone changed from sasmodels WishList to SasView 4.3.0

maybe this can be addressed in 4.3 along with paracrystalline models and validation of the be_polyelectrolyte

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.