Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#483 assigned task
Create web page / section with list of publications using SasView.
Reported by: | ajj | Owned by: | krzywon |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | Admin Tasks |
Component: | SasView | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Work Package: | Support Infrastructure |
Description
This will require some trolling of the literature…
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by butler
- Work Package changed from SasView Bug Fixing to SasView Admin
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by smk78
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by smk78
On Mathieu's advice have removed all records earlier than 2007 (bit of a no-brainer, really)
Mat adds that we should look carefully at those records that remain that have publication years of 2007, 2008 & 2009.
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by ajj
- Owner set to smk78
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by butler
- Owner changed from smk78 to krzywon
- Work Package changed from SasView Admin to Support Infrastructure
Jeff Krzywon had an infrastructure to help with this for NIST SANS instruments. He started a githup repo (pub-tracker) to duplicate that but has since moved the NIST infrastructure to a different approach worked out by Brian Maranville. This should be done soon so we have a sustainable way of finding, entering, and storing the information.
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by butler
- Priority changed from major to critical
See http://www.sasview.org/impact.html (note: this is not yet linked from the other web pages).
This list of publications was generated by searching the publications databases of the ACS and the RSC with the search terms "sasview" OR "sansview" OR "DMR-0520547" (the DANSE grant number). Results were collated, re-formatted, input into Excel, sorted, and the duplicates stripped out. The resulting worksheet was then sorted on the journal, output as text, re-formatted for html presentation, and pasted into this web page.
In the process there some very clearly 'suspicious' records (way too early for even DANSE, crazy journal, etc) were identified. These have been removed. However, it is highly likely that the records remaining still contain some bogus entries. The only way to be certain is to go through them one-by-one!
NOTE: The ACS/RSC search engines are very good in that they search all the text in both the manuscript AND the supplementary information. Capability that far exceeds what Web of Science can do!