Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#347 closed task (fixed)
lamellarFFHG investigate polydisp integration
Reported by: | richardh | Owned by: | richardh |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | SasView 4.0.0 |
Component: | SasView | Keywords: | lamellarFFHG |
Cc: | Work Package: | SasView QA and testing |
Description
lamellarFFHG investigate polydisp integration
compare.sh on new type models shows small differences (few % at high Q) in polydisp integration when polydisp is large on the h_length variable
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by butler
- Milestone changed from SasView 3.1 to SasView Next Release +1
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by butler
- Milestone changed from SasView Next Release +1 to SasView 4.0.0
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by butler
- Priority changed from major to critical
since it seems to "work" but question of precision only this may not be a blocker core task… but still seem part of core work being one hence using critical for now.
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by butler
- Owner changed from RichardH to richardh
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by richardh
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from assigned to closed
Some very minor issues at high Q, with polydisp integrals
PAK noted that -offset=0 in compare.sh fixed this, PAK was truncating the integrals at 1e-05 of peak of function, this not quite good enough here.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
This is a sasmodels question which is part of next release so moving this ticket there as well