#1179 closed enhancement (fixed)
PDF Report should contain SasView Version Number
| Reported by: | smk78 | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | SasView 4.2.0 |
| Component: | SasView | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Work Package: | Reporting Enhancements |
Description
I'm putting this in for 4.2, but it equally applies to 5.0.
A colleague here in ISIS was struggling to reload a .svs project created over 2 years ago in a previous position. At issue was which version of SasView the project had been created in.
By trial-and-good-fortune we discovered that the project had been created in 4.0.1 and then discovered it involved a plugin model that was naturally missing. Recreating the plugin then allowed the project to load ok, but VERY slowly.
@krzywon will be delighted to hear that with the plugin 4.2.0Beta loads the project like greased lightning!
However, a moral from this story is that given model names, algorithms, and save states have, and may again in the future, change, it would be disciplined and professional of us to include the SasView version number in the PDF Report.
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by butler
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by krzywon
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by butler
- Priority changed from critical to blocker
OK .. not really something that should stop a long overdue version 4.2, but since it was easy enough and is now a PR making this a blocker till the PR is merged and the ticket closed
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by butler
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Closed with merging of SasView PR 185. In merging forgot to add the appropriate magical closes #1179
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by smk78
Downloaded Win64 Build 432 and checked. Version number is there in the report. Thanks Jeff!
Do not believe this is really a blocker for 4.2 and don't see that anybody has the bandwidth to add in reasonable time. Should discuss — either it is a blocker or we need to move to 4.3 where it can remain at "critical" level. Leaving this as "Critical" for now even though we should have nothing but blockers left.