Changeset d6f60c3 in sasmodels

Timestamp:

Nov 28, 2016 1:07:54 AM (7 years ago)

Author:

butler

Branches:

master, core_shell_microgels, costrafo411, magnetic_model, ticket-1257-vesicle-product, ticket_1156, ticket_1265_superball, ticket_822_more_unit_tests

Children:

7e74ed5, 1e13e35, fe25eda

Parents:

bdd08df

Message:

comment out tests for fractal_core_shell until we figure out how to
decide what the best authoratative source is now that it is demonstrated
that the old SasView? was in fact incorrect.

File:

• sasmodels/models/fractal_core_shell.py (modified) (1 diff)

sasmodels/models/fractal_core_shell.py

@@ -128 +128 @@
 
 tests = [[{'radius': 20.0, 'thickness': 10.0}, 'ER', 30.0],
-         [{'radius': 20.0, 'thickness': 10.0}, 'VR', 0.703703704],
+         [{'radius': 20.0, 'thickness': 10.0}, 'VR', 0.703703704]]
 
-         # The SasView test result was 0.00169, with a background of 0.001
-         [{'radius': 60.0,
-           'thickness': 10.0,
-           'sld_core': 1.0,
-           'sld_shell': 2.0,
-           'sld_solvent': 3.0,
-           'background': 0.0
-          }, 0.4, 0.00070126]]
+#         # The SasView test result was 0.00169, with a background of 0.001
+#         # They are however wrong as we now know.  IGOR might be a more
+#         # appropriate source. Otherwise will just have to assume this is now
+#         # correct and self generate a correct answer for the future. Until we
+#         # figure it out leave the tests commented out
+#         [{'radius': 60.0,
+#           'thickness': 10.0,
+#           'sld_core': 1.0,
+#           'sld_shell': 2.0,
+#           'sld_solvent': 3.0,
+#           'background': 0.0
+#          }, 0.015211, 692.84]]