Changeset 2a7e20e in sasmodels for doc/developer
- Timestamp:
- Jan 11, 2018 11:02:39 AM (7 years ago)
- Branches:
- master, core_shell_microgels, magnetic_model, ticket-1257-vesicle-product, ticket_1156, ticket_1265_superball, ticket_822_more_unit_tests
- Children:
- e077231
- Parents:
- 2ab331f
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
doc/developer/overview.rst
r3d40839 r2a7e20e 185 185 jitter applied before particle orientation. 186 186 187 When computing the orientation dispersity integral, the weights for 188 the individual points depends on the map projection used to translate jitter 189 angles into latitude/longitude. The choice of projection is set by 190 *sasmodels.generate.PROJECTION*, with the default *PROJECTION=1* for 191 equirectangular and *PROJECTION=2* for sinusoidal. The more complicated 192 Guyou and Postel projections are not implemented. See explore.jitter.draw_mesh 193 for details. 194 187 195 For numerical integration within form factors etc. sasmodels is mostly using 188 196 Gaussian quadrature with 20, 76 or 150 points depending on the model. It also … … 199 207 Useful testing routines include: 200 208 201 :mod:`asymint` a direct implementation of the surface integral for certain 202 models to get a more trusted value for the 1D integral using a 203 reimplementation of the 2D kernel in python and mpmath (which computes math 204 functions to arbitrary precision). It uses $\theta$ ranging from 0 to $\pi$ 205 and $\phi$ ranging from 0 to $2\pi$. It perhaps would benefit from including 206 the U-substitution for $\theta$. 207 208 :mod:`check1d` uses sasmodels 1D integration and compares that with a 209 The *sascomp* utility is used to view and compare models with different 210 parameters and calculation engines. The usual case is to simply plot a 211 model that you are developing:: 212 213 python sascomp path/to/model.py 214 215 Once the obvious problems are addressed, check the numerical precision 216 across a variety of randomly generated inputs:: 217 218 python sascomp -engine=single,double path/to/model.py -sets=10 219 220 You can compare different parameter values for the same or different models. 221 For example when looking along the long axis of a cylinder ($\theta=0$), 222 dispersity in $\theta$ should be equivalent to dispersity in $\phi$ 223 when $\phi=90$:: 224 225 python sascomp -2d cylinder theta=0 phi=0,90 theta_pd_type=rectangle \\ 226 phi_pd_type=rectangle phi_pd=10,1 theta_pd=1,10 length=500 radius=10 227 228 It turns out that they are not because the equirectangular map projection 229 weights the points by $\cos(\theta)$ so $\Delta\theta$ is not identical 230 to $\Delta\phi$. Setting *PROJECTION=2* in :mod:`sasmodels.generate` helps 231 somewhat. Postel would help even more in this case, though leading 232 to distortions elsewhere. See :mod:`sasmodels.compare` for many more details. 233 234 *sascomp -ngauss=n* allows you to set the number of quadrature points used 235 for the 1D integration for any model. For example, a carbon nanotube with 236 length 10 $\mu$\ m and radius 1 nm is not computed correctly at high $q$:: 237 238 python sascomp cylinder length=100000 radius=10 -ngauss=76,500 -double -highq 239 240 Note: ticket 702 gives some forms for long rods and thin disks that may 241 be used in place of the integration, depending on $q$, radius and length; if 242 the cylinder model is updated with these corrections then above call will show 243 no difference. 244 245 *explore/check1d.py* uses sasmodels 1D integration and compares that with a 209 246 rectangle distribution in $\theta$ and $\phi$, with $\theta$ limits set to 210 247 $\pm 90/\sqrt(3)$ and $\phi$ limits set to $\pm 180/\sqrt(3)$ [The rectangle … … 214 251 similar reasoning.] This should rotate the sample through the entire 215 252 $\theta$-$\phi$ surface according to the pattern that you see in jitter.py when 216 you modify it to use 'rectangle' rather than 'gaussian' for its distribution217 without changing the viewing angle. In order to match the 1-D pattern for 218 an arbitraryviewing angle on triaxial shapes, we need to integrate253 you use 'rectangle' rather than 'gaussian' for its distribution without 254 changing the viewing angle. In order to match the 1-D pattern for an arbitrary 255 viewing angle on triaxial shapes, we need to integrate 219 256 over $\theta$, $\phi$ and $\Psi$. 220 257 221 When computing the dispersity integral, weights are scaled by 222 $|\cos(\delta \theta)|$ to account for the points in $\phi$ getting closer 223 together as $\delta \theta$ increases. 224 [This will probably change so that instead of adjusting the weights, we will 225 adjust $\delta\theta$-$\delta\phi$ mesh so that the point density in 226 $\delta\phi$ is lower at larger $\delta\theta$. The flag USE_SCALED_PHI in 227 *kernel_iq.c* selects an alternative algorithm.] 228 229 The integrated dispersion is computed at a set of $(qx, qy)$ points $(q 230 \cos(\alpha), q \sin(\alpha))$ at some angle $\alpha$ (currently angle=0) for 231 each $q$ used in the 1-D integration. The individual $q$ points should be 232 equivalent to asymint rect-n when the viewing angle is set to 233 $(\theta,\phi,\Psi) = (90, 0, 0)$. Such tests can help to validate that 2d 234 models are consistent with 1d models. 235 236 :mod:`sascomp -sphere=n` uses the same rectangular distribution as check1d to 237 compute the pattern of the $q_x$-$q_y$ grid. 238 239 The :mod:`sascomp` utility can be used for 2d as well as 1d calculations to 240 compare results for two sets of parameters or processor types, for example 241 these two oriented cylinders here should be equivalent. 242 243 :mod:`\./sascomp -2d cylinder theta=0 phi=0,90 theta_pd_type=rectangle phi_pd_type=rectangle phi_pd=10,1 theta_pd=1,10 length=500 radius=10` 244 258 *sascomp -sphere=n* uses the same rectangular distribution as check1d to 259 compute the pattern of the $q_x$-$q_y$ grid. This ought to produce a 260 spherically symmetric pattern. 261 262 *explore/precision.py* investigates the accuracy of individual functions 263 on the different execution platforms. This includes the basic special 264 functions as well as more complex expressions used in scattering. In many 265 cases the OpenCL function in sasmodels will use a polynomial approximation 266 over part of the range to improve accuracy, as shown in:: 267 268 python explore/precision.py 3j1/x 269 270 *explore/realspace.py* allows you to set up a Monte Carlo simulation of your 271 model by sampling random points within and computing the 1D and 2D scattering 272 patterns. This was used to check the core shell parallelepiped example. This 273 is similar to the general sas calculator in sasview, though it uses different 274 code. 275 276 *explore/jitter.py* is for exploring different options for handling 277 orientation and orientation dispersity. It uses *explore/guyou.py* to 278 generate the Guyou projection. 279 280 *explore/asymint.py* is a direct implementation of the 1D integration for 281 a number of different models. It calculates the integral for a particular 282 $q$ using several different integration schemes, including mpmath with 100 283 bits of precision (33 digits), so you can use it to check the target values 284 for the 1D model tests. This is not a general purpose tool; you will need to 285 edit the file to change the model parameters. It does not currently 286 apply the $u=cos(\theta)$ substitution that many models are using 287 internally so the 76-point gaussian quadrature may not match the value 288 produced by the eqivalent model from sasmodels. 289 290 *explore/symint.py* is for rotationally symmetric models (just cylinder for 291 now), so it can compute an entire curve rather than a single $q$ point. It 292 includes code to compare the long cylinder approximation to cylinder. 293 294 *explore/rpa.py* is for checking different implementations of the RPA model 295 against calculations for specific blends. This is a work in (suspended) 296 progress. 297 298 There are a few modules left over in *explore* that can probably be removed. 299 *angular_pd.py* was an early version of *jitter.py*. *sc.py* and *sc.c* 300 was used to explore different calculations for paracrystal models; it has 301 been absorbed into *asymint.py*. *transform_angles.py* translates orientation 302 parameters from the SasView 3.x definition to sasmodels. 303 304 *explore/angles.py* generates code for the view and jitter transformations. 305 Keep this around since it may be needed if we add new projections. 245 306 246 307 Testing
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.