Changes between Version 169 and Version 170 of ListofModels


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 20, 2016 11:11:24 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
butler
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ListofModels

    v169 v170  
    1717 
    1818||=!SasView name=||=sasmodels name=||= P(Q) =||= S(Q) =||= Multiply =||= Multiplicity =||= Magnetic =||= SESANS =||= Assigned =||= Converted =||= UTest =||= double err =||= single err =||= double 2D =||= single 2D =|| 
    19 ||Core2ndMomentModel       ||adsorbed_layer     ||Y||.||.||.||.||3||SMK||Y|| - || good || good || - || - || 
     19||Core2ndMomentModel       ||adsorbed_layer     ||Y||.||.||.||.||3||SMK||Y|| - || good|| good|| - || - || 
    2020||!BarBellModel            ||barbell            ||Y||.||.||.||.||3||AJJ||Y|| - ||  good|| good||  FAIL|| FAIL|| 
    2121||BCCrystalModel           ||bcc                ||Y||.||.||.||.||3||AJJ||Y|| - ||  good|| FAIL|| 9e-14|| 2e-2|| 
    2222||BEPolyelectrolyte        ||be_polyelectrolyte ||Y||.||.||.||.||3||PR ||Y|| Y ||  good|| good||     -||    -|| 
    23 ||BinaryHSModel            ||binary_hard_sphere ||Y||N||N||N||N||1||PDB||Y|| Y || FAIL || OK**|| - || - || 
     23||BinaryHSModel            ||binary_hard_sphere ||Y||N||N||N||N||1||PDB||Y|| Y ||  OK|| FAIL|| - || - || 
    2424||!BroadPeakModel          ||broad_peak         ||Y||.||.||.||.||4||PDB||Y|| - ||  good|| good||     -||    -|| 
    2525||!CappedCylinderModel     ||capped_cylinder    ||Y||.||.||.||.||3||HP ||Y|| - ||  good|| good|| 2e-11|| 3e-3|| 
     
    8686||!TwoLorentzian           ||two_lorentzian     ||Y||.||.||.||.||4||PR ||Y|| Y ||  good|| good||     -||    -|| 
    8787||!TwoPowerLaw             ||two_power_law      ||Y||.||.||.||.||4||WP ||Y|| Y ||  good|| good||     -||    -|| 
    88 ||!VesicleModel            ||vesicle            ||Y||.||Y||.||.||2||PDB||Y|| Y ||  good|| good*||     -||    -|| 
     88||!VesicleModel            ||vesicle            ||Y||.||Y||.||.||2||PDB||Y|| Y ||  good*|| good||     -||    -|| 
    8989||!CoreMultiShellModel     ||                   ||Y||.||Y||Y||Y||3||   ||.|| - || - || - || - || - || 
    9090||!OnionExpShellModel      ||                   ||Y||.||Y||Y||.||3||PAK||.|| - || - || - || - || - || 
     
    103103^*^ using taylor expansion near 0 for fq = 3 (sin(qr)/qr - cos(qr))/qr^2^; using quad precision as a cross check, this is more accurate than computing the direct expression for qr < 0.1 in double precision, and so the values will differ from those in sasview.  It is much more accurate in single precision.  This affects many models, including sphere and ellipsoid models.  The cylinder models are using J1(qr)/qr, which has its own numerical expansion and does not suffer from this problem.  Should probably settle on one or the other and move it into the library.  So even though the double precision values for sphere, ellipsoid and triaxial ellipsoid differ by more than 5e-14, they are still marked good.  Similarly, the Teubner-Strey model checks out against the quad precision version and so is marked good. 
    104104 
    105 ^**^ some models such as binary hard sphere and raspberry are inherently "unstable" in certain regions of parameter space.  They require double precision but the difference between old !SasView and sasmodels is still higher than nominally allowed.  However hard to say which is more correct at this point. 
     105OK. some models such as binary hard sphere and raspberry are inherently "unstable" in certain regions of parameter space.  They require double precision but the difference between old !SasView and sasmodels is still higher than nominally allowed.  However hard to say which is more correct at this point. 
    106106 
    107107List of standard parameters has moved to the instructions page