Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of DevNotes/Obsolete/v3p1PunchList

Timestamp:

Jun 28, 2015 9:21:03 PM (9 years ago)

Author:

butler

Comment:

—

DevNotes/Obsolete/v3p1PunchList

@@ -19 +19 @@
  
 5. Why are the parameter errors now appearing in red? (Which we usually keep around here for “fault” messages, so is giving me unnecessary stress.) - NOTE added by PDB: Vaguely remember adding red when something was wrong. Also limits sometimes show up prepopulated.  QUESTION: are we accidentally using the new sasmodels?
->'''TO CHECK'''
+>'''CHECK'''
 
 6. If I set up 3 data sets with constraints, say have M2.radius=M1.radius, M3.radius=M1.radius but then fix M1.radius at say 30 ang, I would expect the constraints to still work, but I get error message on hitting Fit in constraints page. 
@@ -60 +60 @@
 >'''TICKET FOR NEXT RELEASE''' #434
  
-10. though there may be some good underlying reason, can we do away with the top level menu of the documentation?  Model documentation is duplicated in User documentation, so just put Developer documentation at the bottom of the main menu and save clicks for everyone except developers (who get one more).
+10. though there may be some good underlying reason, can we do away with the top level menu of the documentation?  Model documentation is duplicated in User documentation, so just put Developer documentation at the bottom of the main menu and save clicks for everyone except developers (who get one more). NOTE added by PDB: this was discussed briefly at code camp.  My personal feeling was similar (go directly to user docs) but would argue that developer docs do not need to be included in the GUI application. They should be available from command line or from a web page (do we push the docs yet to the web page?). 
+>'''CHECK''' 
 
 11. A “compute” button on the “const & simul fit” tab for a forward calculation only but with all the constraints applied would be useful.
@@ -66 +67 @@
  
 12. In the DREAM parameter 2d correlation plots are very good but don’t actually quantify how large the correlation is. It might be useful to have some scale markers on the axes. The 2d plots are of course very small, so normal axis labels would likely look a mess, perhaps try sticks on the sides at 0 and say +-3sigma. (Normal correlation coefficients as I recall say how many standard deviations parameter A moves if parameter B moves one standard deviation.)
+>'''CHECK'''