Changes between Version 17 and Version 18 of DevNotes/Obsolete/v3p1PunchList


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 29, 2015 5:15:54 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
pkienzle
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DevNotes/Obsolete/v3p1PunchList

    v17 v18  
    99>'''FIXED''' 
    1010  
    11 2. The very nice help documentation works fine for me (apart from the previously mentioned irritating lack of “back” button on screen, though there is one if you right click, or use ALT/leftArrow; whilst ALT/rightArrow is forward.). However the section on the optimizers is not rendering equations so has $n$, $1-sigma$  etc. 
    12 >'''CHECK''' should be simply due to not connecting to Mathjax CDN. But may mean need to include in distributable. 
     112. The very nice help documentation works fine for me (apart from the previously mentioned irritating lack of “back” button on screen, though there is one if you right click, or use ALT/leftArrow; whilst ALT/rightArrow is forward.). However the section on the optimizers is not rendering equations so has $n$, $1-sigma$  etc. [PAK: the main issue is that the dollarmath extension was not included in sphinx, so $n$, etc, were not being parsed as latex expressions.  This is now fixed, but the $1-\sigma$ markup is wrong, and should instead be 1-\ $\sigma$.  This  will be fixed in the next bumps release.] 
     12>'''CHECK''' may still be an issue connecting to https Mathjax CDN over proxy, which may mean we need to include mathjax in distributable. 
    1313  
    14143. I think, from experiment with data rather than looking at the code, the docs for the Hayter MSA structure factor needs to note that even if no salt has been specifically added to the sample,  the “salt conc” may need to be non-zero to allow for counterions that have come off say a micelle as it charges up. One day I will code up a version of the Hayter MSA where the Debye length is explicitly entered. NOTE added by PDB:  I'm not sure that is true.  The implication fromt the documentation (again without delving deeply into the code) is that the counterions are accounted for (assumed to be monovalent one per charge on colloid).  The documentation already indicates that currently the ionic strength cannot be directly entered and that the counterions and salts are all assumed mono-valent.