#817 closed enhancement (fixed)
elliptical bicelle - new model
Reported by: | richardh | Owned by: | richardh |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | SasView 4.1.0 |
Component: | SasView | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Work Package: | SasModels New Model |
Description
Following request from Yang PoWei?
yangpowei@…, Postdoctoral researcher
Small-Angle Scattering group
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Taiwan
Richard will look at making an elliptical core version of the bicelle model to help them with their nice looking SAXS data.
Attachments (4)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by butler
Changed 8 years ago by pkienzle
Changed 8 years ago by pkienzle
Changed 8 years ago by pkienzle
Changed 8 years ago by pkienzle
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by pkienzle
The attached model was created by the ILL summer student. Download the *.2* version and rename it so that it doesn't include the *.2*.
I upgraded the model to the new library names sas_3j1x_x, etc, (in micelles_ellipsoid.2.*) but could not delete the original (in micelles_ellipsoid.*). The model runs, but I did not check the implementation against the literature.
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by richardh
The new core_shell_bicelle_elliptical works fine for 1d data, and I am 98% sure it is OK for 2d data,or rather as badly as the other oriented asymmetric particles, so it could go into 4.1
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by smk78
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by richardh
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from assigned to closed
Closing this as basic 1d & 2d for this new model work OK
But there is perhaps an issue (possibly more general) when I attempt 2d data with psi anlge integration, see #837
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by richardh
The completely unrelated elliptical_micelle mentioned above was renamed in 4.0 to polymer_micelle and appears in the the "spheres" section (as it is not elliptical).
See #868
Given the existence of the marketplace as a distribution mechanism and the impact to 4.1 this could easily be moved to 4.2 and should not impact the release of 4.1. Will leave here for now as work is ongoing and depending on when the freeze is this could make it in.