Changes between Version 1 and Version 3 of Ticket #473


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 1, 2015 10:16:45 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
butler
Comment:

with regard to the naming issue it appears that the sum model editor uses the file name (PowerLawAbsModel.py) while the fit panel's drop down uses the self.name parameter of the model. These seem to usually be the same or similar except in the PowerLawAbsModel which is alphebetically far away from the otherwise first Absolute Power_Law.

The GUI should be consistent and always use one or the other. This should be addressed as part of the new sasmodels implementation as well though it may be appropriate to divide these into two tickets

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #473

    • Property Priority changed from major to critical
    • Property Work Package changed from SasView Bug Fixing to SasModels Redesign

  • Ticket #473 – Description

    v1 v3  
    77What is more, the same bug exists in v3.0.0 and v2.2.1!!! 
    88 
    9 PDB checked and it appears that no multiplicity models appear in the dropdown (eg. RPA10, onion, etc).  This is probably working as designed since I suspect the interface was not obvious for a multiplicity model?  Interestingly there is also a very strange behavior that the shape independent -> Absolute_Power_Law seems to have been renamed in this dropdown to PowerLawAbsModel ... perhaps due to the space in the name?  
     9PDB checked and it appears that no multiplicity models appear in the dropdown (eg. RPA10, onion, etc).  This is probably working as designed since I suspect the interface was not obvious for a multiplicity model?  Interestingly there is also a very strange behavior that the shape independent -> Absolute_Power_Law seems to have been renamed in this dropdown to !PowerLawAbsModel ... perhaps due to the space in the name?