Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1073, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 14, 2018 7:04:38 AM (7 years ago)
Author:
krzywon
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #1073, comment 2

    initial v1  
    2525* Because U is raised to a different power for the first and second terms in the correct version of the function (1/2*nu for the first, and 1/nu for the second). 
    2626 
    27 A second email after hesent the above: 
     27A second email after he sent the above: 
    2828 
    2929* I see where the disagreement is from. Boualem’s paper from 1993 has the form that’s currently in SasView, but more recent publications like https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/staff/hammouda/publications/2017_hammouda_kim_j_mol_liq.pdf  and mine https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/staff/hammouda/publications/2013_hore_et_al_macromolecules.pdf have the form that I’m talking about. So I guess it’s a matter of which is correct!