.. _ellipsoid: Ellipsoid ======================================================= Ellipsoid of revolution with uniform scattering length density. =========== =================================== ============ ============= Parameter Description Units Default value =========== =================================== ============ ============= scale Source intensity None 1 background Source background |cm^-1| 0 sld Ellipsoid scattering length density |1e-6Ang^-2| 4 solvent_sld Solvent scattering length density |1e-6Ang^-2| 1 rpolar Polar radius |Ang| 20 requatorial Equatorial radius |Ang| 400 theta In plane angle degree 60 phi Out of plane angle degree 60 =========== =================================== ============ ============= The returned value is scaled to units of |cm^-1|. The form factor is normalized by the particle volume. Definition ---------- The output of the 2D scattering intensity function for oriented ellipsoids is given by (Feigin, 1987) .. math:: P(Q,\alpha) = {\text{scale} \over V} F^2(Q) + \text{background} where .. math:: F(Q) = {3 (\Delta rho)) V (\sin[Qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)] - \cos[Qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)]) \over [Qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)]^3 } and .. math:: r(R_p,R_e,\alpha) = \left[ R_e^2 \sin^2 \alpha + R_p^2 \cos^2 \alpha \right]^{1/2} $\alpha$ is the angle between the axis of the ellipsoid and $\vec q$, $V$ is the volume of the ellipsoid, $R_p$ is the polar radius along the rotational axis of the ellipsoid, $R_e$ is the equatorial radius perpendicular to the rotational axis of the ellipsoid and $\Delta \rho$ (contrast) is the scattering length density difference between the scatterer and the solvent. To provide easy access to the orientation of the ellipsoid, we define the rotation axis of the ellipsoid using two angles $\theta$ and $\phi$. These angles are defined in the :ref:`cylinder orientation figure `. For the ellipsoid, $\theta$ is the angle between the rotational axis and the $z$-axis. NB: The 2nd virial coefficient of the solid ellipsoid is calculated based on the $R_p$ and $R_e$ values, and used as the effective radius for $S(Q)$ when $P(Q) \cdot S(Q)$ is applied. .. _ellipsoid-1d: .. figure:: img/ellipsoid_1d.JPG The output of the 1D scattering intensity function for randomly oriented ellipsoids given by the equation above. The $\theta$ and $\phi$ parameters are not used for the 1D output. Our implementation of the scattering kernel and the 1D scattering intensity use the c-library from NIST. .. _ellipsoid-geometry: .. figure:: img/ellipsoid_geometry.JPG The angles for oriented ellipsoid. Validation ---------- Validation of our code was done by comparing the output of the 1D model to the output of the software provided by the NIST (Kline, 2006). :num:`Figure ellipsoid-comparison-1d` below shows a comparison of the 1D output of our model and the output of the NIST software. .. _ellipsoid-comparison-1d: .. figure:: img/ellipsoid_comparison_1d.jpg Comparison of the SasView scattering intensity for an ellipsoid with the output of the NIST SANS analysis software. The parameters were set to: *scale* = 1.0, *rpolar* = 20 |Ang|, *requatorial* =400 |Ang|, *contrast* = 3e-6 |Ang^-2|, and *background* = 0.01 |cm^-1|. Averaging over a distribution of orientation is done by evaluating the equation above. Since we have no other software to compare the implementation of the intensity for fully oriented ellipsoids, we can compare the result of averaging our 2D output using a uniform distribution $p(\theta,\phi) = 1.0$. :num:`Figure #ellipsoid-comparison-2d` shows the result of such a cross-check. .. _ellipsoid-comparison-2d: .. figure:: img/ellipsoid_comparison_2d.jpg Comparison of the intensity for uniformly distributed ellipsoids calculated from our 2D model and the intensity from the NIST SANS analysis software. The parameters used were: *scale* = 1.0, *rpolar* = 20 |Ang|, *requatorial* = 400 |Ang|, *contrast* = 3e-6 |Ang^-2|, and *background* = 0.0 |cm^-1|. The discrepancy above *q* = 0.3 |cm^-1| is due to the way the form factors are calculated in the c-library provided by NIST. A numerical integration has to be performed to obtain $P(Q)$ for randomly oriented particles. The NIST software performs that integration with a 76-point Gaussian quadrature rule, which will become imprecise at high $Q$ where the amplitude varies quickly as a function of $Q$. The SasView result shown has been obtained by summing over 501 equidistant points. Our result was found to be stable over the range of $Q$ shown for a number of points higher than 500. REFERENCE L A Feigin and D I Svergun. *Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering*, Plenum, New York, 1987.