source: sasmodels/sasmodels/models/sphere.py @ facb052

ticket-1257-vesicle-productticket_1156ticket_822_more_unit_tests
Last change on this file since facb052 was facb052, checked in by richardh, 5 years ago

added some debug print in direct_model

  • Property mode set to 100644
File size: 4.0 KB
RevLine 
[5d4777d]1r"""
[40a87fa]2For information about polarised and magnetic scattering, see
[9a4811a]3the :ref:`magnetism` documentation.
[19dcb933]4
5Definition
6----------
7
8The 1D scattering intensity is calculated in the following way (Guinier, 1955)
9
10.. math::
11
[eb69cce]12    I(q) = \frac{\text{scale}}{V} \cdot \left[
13        3V(\Delta\rho) \cdot \frac{\sin(qr) - qr\cos(qr))}{(qr)^3}
[19dcb933]14        \right]^2 + \text{background}
15
16where *scale* is a volume fraction, $V$ is the volume of the scatterer,
[7e6bea81]17$r$ is the radius of the sphere and *background* is the background level.
[49da079]18*sld* and *sld_solvent* are the scattering length densities (SLDs) of the
[7e6bea81]19scatterer and the solvent respectively, whose difference is $\Delta\rho$.
[19dcb933]20
21Note that if your data is in absolute scale, the *scale* should represent
22the volume fraction (which is unitless) if you have a good fit. If not,
23it should represent the volume fraction times a factor (by which your data
24might need to be rescaled).
25
26The 2D scattering intensity is the same as above, regardless of the
27orientation of $\vec q$.
28
29Validation
30----------
31
32Validation of our code was done by comparing the output of the 1D model
33to the output of the software provided by the NIST (Kline, 2006).
34
35
[eb69cce]36References
37----------
[19dcb933]38
[0507e09]39.. [#] A Guinier and G. Fournet, *Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays*, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1955)
[19dcb933]40
[0507e09]41Source
42------
43
44`sphere.py <https://github.com/SasView/sasmodels/blob/master/sasmodels/models/sphere.py>`_
45
46`sphere.c <https://github.com/SasView/sasmodels/blob/master/sasmodels/models/sphere.c>`_
47
48Authorship and Verification
49----------------------------
50
51* **Author:**
52* **Last Modified by:**
[ef07e95]53* **Last Reviewed by:** S King and P Parker **Date:** 2013/09/09 and 2014/01/06
[0507e09]54* **Source added by :** Steve King **Date:** March 25, 2019
[5d4777d]55"""
56
[2d81cfe]57import numpy as np
[3c56da87]58from numpy import inf
[5d4777d]59
60name = "sphere"
[19dcb933]61title = "Spheres with uniform scattering length density"
[5d4777d]62description = """\
[49da079]63P(q)=(scale/V)*[3V(sld-sld_solvent)*(sin(qr)-qr cos(qr))
[eb69cce]64                /(qr)^3]^2 + background
65    r: radius of sphere
[19dcb933]66    V: The volume of the scatter
67    sld: the SLD of the sphere
[49da079]68    sld_solvent: the SLD of the solvent
[5d4777d]69"""
[a5d0d00]70category = "shape:sphere"
[5d4777d]71
[3e428ec]72#             ["name", "units", default, [lower, upper], "type","description"],
[42356c8]73parameters = [["sld", "1e-6/Ang^2", 1, [-inf, inf], "sld",
[3e428ec]74               "Layer scattering length density"],
[42356c8]75              ["sld_solvent", "1e-6/Ang^2", 6, [-inf, inf], "sld",
[3e428ec]76               "Solvent scattering length density"],
77              ["radius", "Ang", 50, [0, inf], "volume",
78               "Sphere radius"],
79             ]
[5d4777d]80
[b297ba9]81source = ["lib/sas_3j1x_x.c", "sphere.c"]
[71b751d]82have_Fq = True
[d277229]83effective_radius_type = ["radius"]
[c036ddb]84
[404ebbd]85def random():
[b297ba9]86    """Return a random parameter set for the model."""
[404ebbd]87    radius = 10**np.random.uniform(1.3, 4)
88    pars = dict(
89        radius=radius,
90    )
91    return pars
92
[7e6bea81]93tests = [
94    [{}, 0.2, 0.726362],
95    [{"scale": 1., "background": 0., "sld": 6., "sld_solvent": 1.,
96      "radius": 120., "radius_pd": 0.2, "radius_pd_n":45},
97     0.2, 0.228843],
[304c775]98    [{"radius": 120., "radius_pd": 0.2, "radius_pd_n":45},
99     0.1, None, None, 120., None, 1.0],
[265c657]100    [{"@S": "hardsphere"},
[facb052]101       0.1, 0.7940350343881906], # Q=0.1 this is current value, not verified elsewhere yet
[265c657]102        [{"@S": "hardsphere",          # hard sphere structure factor
[0b8a1fc]103     "structure_factor_mode": 1,  # decoupling approximation
[facb052]104     "effective_radius_type": 1, "radius_effective":27.0 # equivalent sphere   Currently have hardwired model_test to accept radius_effective
105     # direct_model has the name & value BUT does it get passed to S(Q)???  What about volfracion, plus the many parameters used by other S(Q) ?
106     # effective_radius_type does NOT appear in the list, has it been stripped out???
[265c657]107         }, 0.1, 0.7940350343881906],
[facb052]108#       [{"@S": "hardsphere",          # hard sphere structure factor
109#     "structure_factor_mode": 3,  #  -  WHY same result?
110#     "effective_radius_type": 3, "radius_effective":23.0    #
111#        }, 0.1, 0.7940350343881906]
[7e6bea81]112]
[2464785]113# putting None for expected result will pass the test if there are no errors from the routine, but without any check on the value of the result
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.